Board Regents Normal School v. Painter
Decision Date | 22 December 1890 |
Citation | 102 Mo. 464,14 S.W. 938 |
Parties | BOARD REGENTS NORMAL SCHOOL DIST. No. 3 v. PAINTER. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cape Girardeau court of common pleas; ROBERT L. WILSON, Judge.
F. E. Burrough, for appellant. B. F. Davis, for respondent.
The plaintiff, as a body corporate, brought this action of ejectment to recover outlot H in the city of Cape Girardeau. The lot in question is the eighth and last parcel of land described in the following deed, dated the 11th September, 1820: etc. The plaintiff put in evidence the foregoing deed, and an ordinance of the city of Cape Girardeau, approved 24th September, 1873, which provided "that the mayor of the city of Cape Girardeau be, and he is hereby, authorized to offer to donate to the regents of the Southeast Missouri Normal School said described lot, as an additional inducement to locate said school in said city, and he is authorized to make a deed to said regents of said normal school, under the seal of said city, turning over, confirming, and quitclaiming all right of the city to said lot to said regents of said school for said purpose, always provided said Southeast Missouri Normal School shall be located in the city of Cape Girardeau, and which said lot may be sold and disposed of as the said regents may see proper, to further the erection of the buildings necessary for said school within said city." Also a deed, dated 13th November, 1873, executed pursuant to said ordinance, and purporting to convey lot H to the regents of the Southeast Missouri Normal School. The plaintiff produced further evidence to the effect that the school was located in the city of Cape Girardeau in 1872 or 1873. The same evidence shows that the building was not located on...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Mertens v. McMahon
-
Dickey v. Volker
...v. St. Louis, 29 Mo. 543; State ex rel. Pittman v. Adams, 44 Mo. 570; Academy of the Visitation v. Clemens, 50 Mo. 167; Board of Regents v. Painter, 102 Mo. 469; Lilly v. Tobbein, 103 Mo. 477; Women's Christian Assn. v. Kansas City, 147 Mo. 103; Lackland v. Walker, 151 Mo. 210; State ex rel......
-
Palmer v. City of Liberal
...plant or to any other person for private profits. Gaskins v. Williams, 235 Mo. 563; Cummings v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 259; Board of Regents v. Painter, 102 Mo. 464; Belcher Sugar Refining Co. v. St. Louis Grain Elevator Co., 82 Mo. 121; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 361. (7) Appellants are entitled......
- Mertens v. McMahon