Bobertz v. Bd. Of Educ. Of Hillside Tp.
Citation | 52 A.2d 827,135 N.J.L. 555 |
Decision Date | 15 May 1947 |
Docket Number | No. 15.,15. |
Parties | BOBERTZ v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HILLSIDE TP. et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Proceedings under the Workmen's Compensation Act by L. Cecelia Bobertz, claimant, opposed by the Board of Education of the Township of Hillside, County of Union, State of New Jersey, employer. A determination of the Workmen's Compensation Bureau awarding compensation was affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas, and by the Supreme Court, 134 N.J.L. 444, 48 A.2d 847, and the employer appeals.
Reversed.
Milton A. Feller and Peter L. Hughes, Jr., both of Elizabeth, for respondent.
Wilbur A. Stevens and Cox & Walburg, all of Newark (Arthur F. Mead, of Newark, of counsel), for appellant.
This is an appeal in a workmen's compensation case in which the Bureau, the Court of Common Pleas and the Supreme Court found that the employee, Cecelia Bobertz, sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment. The facts as found by the Supreme Court are as follows:
‘The importance of this particular extracurricular work is further indicated by the fact that when these meetings interfered with the teaching of regular classes, the principal of the school took over the classes in order that the teacher could attend the meeting assigned to her.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Noble v. Zimmerman
...1956, 209 Or. 66, 304 P.2d 415, 417; Persons v. Stokes, 1954, 222 Miss. 479, 76 So.2d 517, 519. Cf. Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Tp., 1947, 135 N.J.L. 555, 52 A.2d 827. See also 58 Am.Jur., Workmen's Compensation, § 211, p. The evidence in the record here is undisputed that the......
-
Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.
...Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp., 134 N.J.L. 444, 447, 48 A.2d 847 (Sup.Ct.1946), reversed on other grounds, 135 N.J.L. 555, 52 A.2d 827 (E. & A. 1947); Van Ness v. Borough of Haledon, 136 N.J.L. 623, 627, 56 A.2d 888 (E. & A. 1948); Bradley v. Danzis Pharmacy, 5 N.J.Super. 33......
-
Mikkelsen v. N. L. Industries
...Act. Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp., 134 N.J.L. 444, 48 A.2d 847 (Sup.Ct.1946), reversed on other grounds, 135 N.J.L. 555, 52 A.2d 827 (E. & A. 1947); Cf. O'Brien v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co., 37 N.J. 158, 162, 179 A.2d 740 (1962). The foregoing exception to the......
-
Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.
...special errand. Hence if the point of departure or return is the employee's home, the travel is covered. See Bobertz v. Board of Education, 135 N.J.L. 555, 52 A.2d 827 (E. & A.1947); Ryan v. St. Vincent de Paul Roman Catholic Church, supra (41 N.J.Super. 206, 124 A.2d 315); O'Reilly v. Robe......