Bogenschultz v. Green
| Decision Date | 23 November 2016 |
| Citation | 144 A.D.3d 958,43 N.Y.S.3d 59,2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 07917 |
| Parties | Janet BOGENSCHULTZ, respondent-appellant, v. David GREEN, appellant-respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
144 A.D.3d 958
43 N.Y.S.3d 59
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 07917
Janet BOGENSCHULTZ, respondent-appellant,
v.
David GREEN, appellant-respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov. 23, 2016.
David Green, Huntington, N.Y., appellant-respondent pro se.
Janet Bogenschultz, Beacon, N.Y., respondent-appellant pro se.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SHERI S. ROMAN, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Francis A. Nicolai, J.), dated May 22, 2014, and appeal and cross appeal from stated portions of a judgment of divorce of that court (Victor G. Grossman, J.) dated July 22, 2014. The order, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, decided certain motions. The judgment, upon the order, among other things, awarded the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $2,000 per month until she reached the age of 59 ½.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter
of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal and cross appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).
The plaintiff and the defendant were married in 1993 and have no children. During the marriage, the defendant obtained two advanced degrees in political science and the plaintiff, who has a master's degree, was employed as a librarian. The parties relocated twice so that the defendant could pursue his...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Galanopoulos v. Galanopoulos
...award was a provident exercise of discretion (see Ralis v. Ralis, 146 A.D.3d 831, 833, 46 N.Y.S.3d 631 ; Bogenschultz v. Green, 144 A.D.3d 958, 959, 43 N.Y.S.3d 59 ; Maddaloni v. Maddaloni, 142 A.D.3d 646, 654, 36 N.Y.S.3d 695 ; Perdios v. Perdios, 135 A.D.3d 840, 842, 24 N.Y.S.3d 680 ). In......
-
Minervini v. Minervini
...in the amount of $1,740 per month for 32 months (see Kumar v. Chander, 149 A.D.3d 709, 51 N.Y.S.3d 177 ; Bogenschultz v. Green, 144 A.D.3d 958, 959, 43 N.Y.S.3d 59 ; see also Swickle v. Swickle, 47 A.D.3d 704, 705, 850 N.Y.S.2d 487 ). In light of factors such as the disparity of income betw......
-
Aqua-Trol Corp. v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.
...notice of the defendant's termination of the attorney-client relationship was communicated to it prior to March 7, 2012 (see generally 144 A.D.3d 958Shumsky v. Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d at 171, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365, 750 N.E.2d 67 ). Although the defendant contends that the parties' relationship ter......