Boice v. State, 88-02596
| Decision Date | 11 May 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-02596,88-02596 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D1311 Donald Andrew BOICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Mr. Boice appeals his convictions and sentences for purchase of cocaine and tampering with evidence. We affirm the conviction and sentence for the purchase of cocaine, but reverse the conviction and sentence for tampering with evidence.
At 6:45 p.m., on February 19, 1988, Mr. Boice stopped his car at an intersection in Winter Haven, Florida, and purchased a single rock of cocaine in a small bag from an undercover police officer. As soon as Mr. Boice completed the purchase, he was surrounded by uniformed officers in marked police cars. After the other officers arrived, the undercover officer observed Mr. Boice throw the bag of cocaine out the window of his car. One of the officers retrieved the bag from the roadway. The bag was near the door on the driver's side of Mr. Boice's car. The officer who retrieved the bag stated that he just looked on the ground and located the bag. There is no evidence that the cocaine had been altered or destroyed. After receiving his Miranda warnings, the defendant admitted that he had purchased the cocaine for his personal use.
Section 918.13, Florida Statutes (1987), states:
(1) No person, knowing that a criminal trial or proceeding or an investigation by a duly constituted prosecuting authority, law enforcement agency, grand jury or legislative committee of this state is pending or is about to be instituted, shall:
(a) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in such proceeding or investigation.
The defendant's act of tossing the small bag of cocaine away from his person while in the presence of the arresting officers at the scene of the purchase does not rise to the level of conduct which constitutes a concealment or removal of something for the purpose of impairing its availability for the criminal trial. In this case, the defendant did not conceal the cocaine. Although he removed the cocaine from his hand, he did not remove the cocaine from the immediate area of his arrest. Mr. Boice merely abandoned the evidence.
The statute must be construed most favorably to the accused. § 775.021(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). We do not attempt to define the extreme boundaries of "tampering" in this case. However, we do not believe that the legislature intended the simple act of abandoning a bag of crack cocaine at the scene of an arrest, in the clear sight of a law enforcement officer, to constitute the commission of this additional third-degree felony. 1 If the defendant's act in this case constituted tampering, then a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thornton v. State
...Ill.App.3d 641, 248 Ill.Dec. 463, 734 N.E.2d 171, 178 (2000); see also Hawkins, 406 S.W.3d at 134 (“In the wake of Boice [ v. State, 560 So.2d 1383 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990) ], [ State v.] Patton [898 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tenn.Crim.App.1994) ], and similar decisions, the jurisdictions that have en......
-
State v. Hawkins
...in Florida were among the first to recognize the distinction between tamperingand abandonment. The defendant in Boice v. State, 560 So.2d 1383 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990), bought cocaine from an undercover police officer. After the police surrounded him, he dropped the drugs out of his car windo......
-
State v. Jones
...when the defendant, who was carrying cocaine in his mouth and spit it out, exposed it to the view of the police); Boice v. State, 560 So.2d 1383 (Fla.App. 2 Dist.1990) (defendant's tossing bag of crack cocaine away from his person while in presence of arresting officers amounted merely to a......
-
In re MF
...when the defendant, who was carrying cocaine in his mouth and spit it out, exposed it to the view of the police. In Boice v. State, 560 So.2d 1383 (Fla.App.1990), the reviewing court concluded that the defendant's act of tossing a small bag of crack cocaine away from his person while in the......