Bolden v. Wise Alloys, LLC
Decision Date | 19 September 2008 |
Docket Number | 2070084. |
Citation | 5 So.3d 1287 |
Parties | Rodger BOLDEN v. WISE ALLOYS, LLC. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
J. Zach Higgs, Jr., and Robert D. Lee of Higgs & Emerson, Huntsville, for appellant.
Submitted on appellant's brief only.
On December 1, 2005, Rodger Bolden sued his employer, Wise Alloys, LLC, seeking workers' compensation benefits. On August 6, 2007, the trial court entered a judgment denying Bolden workers' compensation benefits. The trial court subsequently set aside its judgment of August 6, 2007. On September 18, 2007, the trial court rendered a judgment denying Bolden workers' compensation benefits. Bolden appealed.
Although neither party addresses the issue, this court must first determine whether it has jurisdiction over this appeal.
Naylor v. Naylor, 981 So.2d 440, 441 (Ala. Civ.App.2007).
The trial court's September 18, 2007, judgment was never input into the State Judicial Information System ("SJIS"). Rule 58(c), Ala. R. Civ. P., which was amended effective September 16, 2006, provides:
The Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 58 Effective September 19, 2006, state, in part:
Although this action was initiated in 2005, our supreme court has stated that the September 19, 2006, amendment to Rule 58(c) applies to cases that were pending at the time the amendment became effective. Ex parte Luker, [Ms. 1051805,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arlington Props., Inc. v. Brown (Ex parte Arlington Props., Inc.)
...of entering a judgment.” See Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 58 Effective September 19, 2006, quoted in Bolden v. Wise Alloys, LLC, 5 So.3d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.2008). Rule 58(c) specifically provides that a judgment is deemed entered as of the date it is entered into the State Judicia......
-
Casey v. Casey
...as the former husband asserts happened in that action, there is no final judgment from which to appeal. See Bolden v. Wise Alloys, LLC, 5 So.3d 1287, 1289 (Ala.Civ.App.2008). As the main opinion states, "[w]hen actions are ordered consolidated, ‘each action retains its separate identity and......
-
Dillard v. Lepore
...subject-matter jurisdiction to conduct a trial de novo regarding the issues raised in the .03 action. See Bolden v. Wise Alloys, LLC, 5 So.3d 1287, 1289 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) ("Because the [juvenile court's] judgment was rendered, but never input into the [State Judicial Information System]......
-
Hamilton v. Csc Distribution, Inc.
...specially. I agree that the appeal is taken from a nonfinal judgment and, therefore, must be dismissed. See Bolden v. Wise Alloys, LLC, 5 So.3d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.2008) (dismissing an appeal as one taken from a nonfinal judgment when a judgment had been rendered but never input into the Stat......