Bonaparte v. American-First Nat. Bank in Okla. City
Decision Date | 29 October 1929 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 19167 |
Citation | 1929 OK 459,281 P. 958,139 Okla. 189 |
Parties | BONAPARTE, County Treas., v. AMERICAN-FIRST NAT. BANK IN OKLAHOMA CITY |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 1. Taxation--Classification of Property--Shares of Bank Stock as Separate Class.
Classification of property for purposes of taxation is a legislative function, and when such classification is not based upon an invidious or unreasonable distinction, it will not be interfered with by the courts, and shares of stock in banks and banking associations may be made a separate class for such taxation purposes. Comanche County et al. v. American Nat. Bank of Lawton, 122 Okla. 34, 252 P. 408.
2. Same--Limitation on Ad Valorem Rate for Stock in National Banks.
Shares of stock in banks organized under the banking laws of the United States shall not be listed and assessed for ad valorem taxation purposes at a greater rate than is assessed upon any other moneyed capital in the hands of the individual citizens of the state. Section 9607, C. O. S. 1921.
3. Same--Statutes Construed and Applied.
"Moneyed capital in the hands of the individual citizens" includes money invested in private banking enterprises, investments of individuals in securities that represent money at interest, and other evidences of indebtedness such as normally enter into the banking business. Comanche County et al. v. American National Bank of Lawton, 122 Okla. 34, 252 P. 408.
4. Same.
Sections 9588 and 9608, C. O. S. 1921, provide rates of taxation on moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens invested in securities which represent money at interest and other evidences of indebtedness such as normally enter into the banking business. Under the provisions of section 9607, C. O. S. 1921, the rate of taxation upon shares of stock in banks organized under the banking laws of the United States may not be at a greater rate than is provided by sections 9588 and 9608, Id.
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; T. G. Chambers, Judge.
Action by the American-First National Bank, in Oklahoma City, against E. B. Bonaparte, County Treasurer. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Wilson & Wilson, Embry, Johnson & Tolbert, Brown & Stater, and Wilbur J. Holleman, for defendant in error.
J. K. Wright, Co. Atty., W. F. Smith, Asst. Co. Atty., and M. W. McKenzie, Municipal Counsellor of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
¶1 The defendant in error, hereinafter called the bank, commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the county treasurer, to recover money paid for taxes levied against the shares of stock of the bank by the proper agencies of government in Oklahoma county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1927, said money having been paid by said bank under protest for the use and benefit of the shareholders as provided by the statutes.
¶2 It was agreed that the rate of taxation levied against said property was $ 44.11 per $ 1,000 of the assessed valuation. It is the contention of the bank that the tax levied and assessed was illegal, unauthorized, and unenforceable because the same was in excess of the rate of taxation levied against moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens within the state of Oklahoma, in that the rate assessed against moneyed capital in the hands of the individual citizens for the same year was at the rate of 40 mills per $ 1,000, and that by reason thereof the rate assessed against the shares of stock was greater than that assessed against the moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens in competition therewith.
¶3 The petition, as supplemented, asserts a similar claim as to the tax paid by the bank upon its real estate. This proposition is not urged on the appeal, no doubt for the reason that the evidence shows that the real estate of the bank was taxed at the same rate as other real estate.
¶4 The answer of the county treasurer was, in substance, a general denial. At the conclusion of the evidence, the county treasurer interposed a demurrer thereto and asserted that the evidence was insufficient in law to entitle the bank to recover. The county treasurer offered no evidence, and stood on his demurrer to the evidence. The court took the matter under advisement and made its findings of facts and conclusions of law and rendered judgment in conformity therewith.
¶5 The findings of facts and conclusions of law, with the formal parts omitted, are as follows;
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. State Bd. of Equal.
...upon an invidious or unreasonable distinction, it will not be interfered with by the court. Bonaparte, County Treas., v. American First National Bank, 139 Okla. 189, 281 P. 958; Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. State Board of Equalization, 155 Okla. 183, 8 P.2d 732; Coman......
-
Bd. of Com'Rs of Okla. Cnty. v. State Bd. of Equal.
...and not the tax that may have been levied for the calendar year 1911." ¶19 In the case of Bonaparte, County Treas., v. American-First Nat. Bank in Oklahoma City, 139 Okla. 189, 281 P. 958, this court held in the 1st paragraph of the syllabus: "Classification of property for purposes of taxa......
-
Bonaparte v. American-First Nat. Bank in Oklahoma City
... 281 P. 958 139 Okla. 189, 1929 OK 459 BONAPARTE, County Treasurer, v. AMERICAN-FIRST NAT. BANK IN OKLAHOMA CITY. No. 19167. Supreme Court of Oklahoma October 29, 1929 ... Syllabus ... by the Court ... Classification ... of property for purposes of taxation is a ... ...
-
Am. Nat'l Bank of Tonkawa v. Andrews, Co.
...Under Protest--Demurrer to Petition Erroneously Sustained. Paragraph 2 of the syllabus in the case of Bonaparte v. American-First National Bank of Oklahoma City, 139 Okla. 189, 281 P. 958, is here adopted as authority for holding herein that the trial court erred in sustaining defendant's g......