Bond v. Thruston
Decision Date | 13 March 1940 |
Docket Number | 3263. |
Citation | 100 P.2d 74,60 Nev. 19 |
Parties | BOND v. THRUSTON et ux. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County; Edgar Eather, Presiding Judge.
On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. For former opinion, see 98 P.2d 343.
Jo G. Martin, of Pioche, for appellant.
Harold M. Morse, of Las Vegas, for respondents.
Appellant has petitioned for a rehearing on his appeal, and in support of the petition says: "The principal defect of the complaint complained of by the appellant in his first two specifications of error in his appeal from the order refusing to grant a new trial is not dealt with in the opinion, and apparently has not been considered by this Honorable Court."
He then stated what he considered such defect in the complaint to be, and proceeded to make substantially the same argument and cited the same authorities as in his briefs filed on the appeal.
We considered all the points and authorities submitted by appellant before rendering the opinion affirming the judgment of the trial Court, and gave to them the weight and importance to which they were entitled.
We were satisfied the opinion clearly applied the law to the facts as shown by the record in this case, and petitioner has not presented any point or submitted any authority in the petition for rehearing which warrants further consideration of the case.
The petition, therefore, is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tomiyasu v. Golden
...res judicata cannot exist by reason of numerous decisions of this court, particularly Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 98 P.2d 343, 100 P.2d 74; Casey v. Musgrave, 72 Nev. 31, 292 P.2d 1066; Reno Club, Inc. v. Harrah, 70 Nev. 125, 260 P.2d 304, and other In Bankers Trust Co. v. Pacific Employe......
-
Reno Club, Inc. v. Harrah
...is based the identical cause of action which formed the basis of the former suit? In Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 24, 98 P.2d 343, 345, 100 P.2d 74, this court, in dealing with the elements constituting a cause of action, quoted Pomeroy's Code Remedies as follows: 'The cause of action, as ......
-
Vanover v. Cook, No. 99-3314
... ... See Vanover, 987 P.2d at 1110. The court based its jurisdictional ruling on a supersedeas bond which Vanover filed with the court to perfect his appeal. The ... Page 1186 ... bond instrument authorized the district court to pay $21,000 ... ...
-
Farnow v. Las Vegas Aerie No. 1213, Fraternal Order of Eagles
...finding is therefore without support. Hawkins, District Judge, speaking for this court in Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 98 P.2d 343, 346, 100 P.2d 74, said: 'A comparison of the with the findings discloses that certain of the findings are on matters outside the issues made by the pleadings;......