Bond v. Thruston

Decision Date13 March 1940
Docket Number3263.
Citation100 P.2d 74,60 Nev. 19
PartiesBOND v. THRUSTON et ux.
CourtNevada Supreme Court

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County; Edgar Eather, Presiding Judge.

On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. For former opinion, see 98 P.2d 343.

Jo G. Martin, of Pioche, for appellant.

Harold M. Morse, of Las Vegas, for respondents.

L. O. HAWKINS, District Judge.

Appellant has petitioned for a rehearing on his appeal, and in support of the petition says: "The principal defect of the complaint complained of by the appellant in his first two specifications of error in his appeal from the order refusing to grant a new trial is not dealt with in the opinion, and apparently has not been considered by this Honorable Court."

He then stated what he considered such defect in the complaint to be, and proceeded to make substantially the same argument and cited the same authorities as in his briefs filed on the appeal.

We considered all the points and authorities submitted by appellant before rendering the opinion affirming the judgment of the trial Court, and gave to them the weight and importance to which they were entitled.

We were satisfied the opinion clearly applied the law to the facts as shown by the record in this case, and petitioner has not presented any point or submitted any authority in the petition for rehearing which warrants further consideration of the case.

The petition, therefore, is denied.

TABER, C.J., and DUCKER, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Tomiyasu v. Golden
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 30 Marzo 1965
    ...res judicata cannot exist by reason of numerous decisions of this court, particularly Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 98 P.2d 343, 100 P.2d 74; Casey v. Musgrave, 72 Nev. 31, 292 P.2d 1066; Reno Club, Inc. v. Harrah, 70 Nev. 125, 260 P.2d 304, and other In Bankers Trust Co. v. Pacific Employe......
  • Reno Club, Inc. v. Harrah
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 17 Agosto 1953
    ...is based the identical cause of action which formed the basis of the former suit? In Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 24, 98 P.2d 343, 345, 100 P.2d 74, this court, in dealing with the elements constituting a cause of action, quoted Pomeroy's Code Remedies as follows: 'The cause of action, as ......
  • Vanover v. Cook, No. 99-3314
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 31 Julio 2001
    ... ... See Vanover, 987 P.2d at 1110. The court based its jurisdictional ruling on a supersedeas bond which Vanover filed with the court to perfect his appeal. The ... Page 1186 ... bond instrument authorized the district court to pay $21,000 ... ...
  • Farnow v. Las Vegas Aerie No. 1213, Fraternal Order of Eagles
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 19 Enero 1948
    ...finding is therefore without support. Hawkins, District Judge, speaking for this court in Bond v. Thruston, 60 Nev. 19, 98 P.2d 343, 346, 100 P.2d 74, said: 'A comparison of the with the findings discloses that certain of the findings are on matters outside the issues made by the pleadings;......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT