Bonham v. State
| Decision Date | 01 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-2432,82-2432 |
| Citation | 450 So.2d 269 |
| Parties | John BONHAM and Gerald Coucoulas, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami, and Diane H. Tutt, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Kurt Marmar, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Penny H. Brill and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
The defendants' failure to object at trial to the admission of certain evidence which they had unsuccessfully moved to suppress before trial waives their right to claim on appeal that the evidence was erroneously admitted. Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So.2d 361 (1942); Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927); Rodriguez v. State, 433 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and cases collected therein; Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We find no merit in, and certainly no support for, the defendants' contention that an exception to this well-settled rule exists where the pretrial motion to suppress is heard and decided immediately before the commencement of trial.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thomas v. State, 89-449
...in limine was denied "immediately prior to trial." German v. State, 379 So.2d at 1013. (Emphasis added). Similarly, in Bonham v. State, 450 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984), the Third DCA held that the defendant waived his right to appellate review of the trial court's denial of his motion to ......
-
Snow v. Nelson
... ... the result is a rather inequitable one. While the parent, in this state, is not liable for the torts of his minor because of the mere fact of paternity, nevertheless, it would appear, that if it is plainly shown by the ... ...
-
Cordero v. State, 91-81
...contraband. McKelton v. State, 528 So.2d 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Bonham v. State, 450 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Gilling v. State, 443 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 5th DCA We do agree with appellant, however, that the trial court erred in denying......
-
Moe v. State, 83-2559
...PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Frenette v. State, 158 Fla. 675, 29 So.2d 869 (1947); Bonham v. State, 450 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Stanley v. State, 357 So.2d 1031 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); White v. State, 348 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); McDuffie v. State,......