Booty v. O'Connor
Decision Date | 22 November 1928 |
Docket Number | (No. 9175.) |
Citation | 13 S.W.2d 220 |
Parties | BOOTY et al. v. O'CONNOR et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Jackson County; John M. Green, Judge.
Suit by William J. O'Connor and others against Gertrude Booty, individually and as administratrix of the estate of E. F. Booty, deceased, and guardian of his minor heirs, and others, in which R. E. Brooks intervened after his dismissal from the suit, and certain other defendants were dismissed. From a judgment for plaintiffs against the remaining defendants and intervener, such defendants and intervener appeal. Affirmed.
John T. Vance and Rose & Sample, all of Edna, and Morris, Sewell & Morris and R. H. Ward, all of Houston, for appellants.
J. T. Linebaugh, of Victoria, and H. W. Wallace, of Cuero, for appellees.
This suit was brought by appellees on September 3, 1924, to recover from appellants the title and possession of a tract of 213.1 acres of land, a part of the Valentine Garcia grant, in Jackson county. The defendants in the suit were the administratrix and heirs of E. F. Booty, deceased, and R. E. Brooks, C. W. Boyce, Manuel Zambrano, and Saturnina Nanes.
The administratrix and heirs of E. F. Booty answered on October 2, 1924, by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of not guilty, and special plea of limitation against the right of plaintiffs to recover title to the land as the holders of the superior title reserved by the vendors of E. F. Booty to secure the payment of vendor's lien notes executed by him as part compensation for the land. These defendants further pleaded:
They further pleaded in the alternative that, if it be found that plaintiffs have a superior title because of unpaid purchase money due upon the land, that after ascertaining and fixing the amount so due the defendants be decreed a reasonable time to pay said amount, and redeem the land.
The defendant R. E. Brooks answered on September 23, 1924, by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of not guilty, and by special plea setting up the purchase by him from plaintiffs, or their ancestor, of a note for $4,500 secured by a vendor's lien upon the land, and averring the facts in connection with said transaction as an estoppel and waiver of plaintiffs' right against this defendant to recover the land upon their superior vendor's lien title.
By amended answer, filed by this defendant on September 27, 1927, his special defenses are fully pleaded as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Marshall
...not required even to make a mortgagee a party. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. Co. v. State, Tex.Civ.App.1896, 36 S.W. 111; Booty v. O'Connor, Tex.Civ. App.1928, 13 S.W.2d 220, affirmed Brooks v. O'Connor, 120 Tex. 121, 39 S.W.2d This Court has applied these principles on several occasions in dive......
-
Milner v. Whatley
...title to land a mortgagee not in possession and whose rights are not prejudiced or affected is not a necessary party. Booty v. O'Connor, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 220; Brooks v. O'Connor, 120 Tex. 121, 39 S.W.2d Oil and gas leaseholders and holders of mineral interest in the land are likewise......
-
Crawford v. Thomas
...the litigation and therefore are not bound by the judgment. Heirs of Tevis v. Armstrong et al., 71 Tex. 59, 9 S.W. 134; Booty v. O'Connor, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 220. The judgment of the trial court is hereby reformed as above provided, and in all other respects the same is TIREY, Justice ......
-
Hejl v. Wirth
...the stream should be the boundary. We believe it is land, accordingly, overrule the motion for rehearing. Overruled. 1 Booty v. O'Connor, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 220, affirmed Brooks v. O'Connor, 120 Tex. 121, 39 S.W.2d 22; Rule 784, ...