Borden, Jr. v. State, 1972037
Decision Date | 01 October 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 1972037,1972037 |
Citation | 769 So.2d 950 |
Parties | (Ala. 2000) Re: James Henry Borden, Jr. v. State |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Ex parte James Henry Borden, Jr.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
(Lawrence Circuit Court, CC-93-228;
Court of Criminal Appeals, CR-94-0453)
James Henry Borden, Jr., was convicted of murder made capital because he had been convicted of another murder within the 20 years preceding this offense, see § 13A-5-40(a)(13), Ala. Code 1975. The jury, by a vote of 10-2, recommended that he be sentenced to death. The trial court accepted this recommendation and sentenced Borden
to death by electrocution. On appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the trial court's written sentencing order was deficient in that it failed to comply with the requirement of § 13A-5-47(d), Ala. Code 1975, that the trial court enter specific written findings concerning the existence or non-existence of each aggravating circumstance enumerated in § 13A-5-51, and any additional mitigating circumstances offered pursuant to § 13A-5-52. Borden v. State, [Ms. CR-94-0453, September 26, 1997] __ So. 2d __ (Ala.Crim.App. 1997). Accordingly, the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the cause for the trial court to enter specific written findings concerning the existence or nonexistence of each aggravating circumstance enumerated in § 13A-5-49, each mitigating circumstance enumerated in § 13A-5-51, and any additional non-statutory mitigating circumstances offered pursuant to § 13A-5-52.
On the circuit court's return to that remand order, the Court of Criminal Appeals, on May 29, 1998, wrote another opinion, stating that the amended sentencing order indicated that the trial court had found the existence of two statutory aggravating circumstances: (1) that Borden, in September 1975, had been convicted of a felony involving the use of violence to the person ( , second-degree murder)see § 13A-5-49(2); and (2) that the capital offense was committed while Borden was engaged in an attempt to commit a kidnapping and a rape, see § 13A-5-49(4). The amended order further indicated that the trial court, after making specific written findings as to each circumstance, found that none of the statutory mitigating circumstances enumerated in § 13A-5-51 had been proven to exist. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Borden's conviction and his sentence of death. See opinion on return to remand, ___ So. 2d at ___.
The facts of this case are stated in the original opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals as follows:
___ So.2d at ___. (Citations omitted.)
Borden first argues that his conviction and death sentence are void, because, he says, the trial judge failed to swear in the petit jury which ultimately convicted him of capital murder. The administration of the oath to the petit jury is required by § 12-16-170, Ala. Code 1975, as well as by Rule 18.5, Ala. R. Crim. P. Foshee v. State, 672 So. 2d 1387 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995).
On November 28, 1994, at the Lawrence County Courthouse in Moulton, the trial judge welcomed the initial panel of prospective jurors; it then had them stand and state their names, addresses, and occupation. The trial judge administered the oath to the prospective jurors as follows:
(C.R. 112-13).
After questioning and excusing some members of the venire for cause, the trial judge asked those remaining to stand and take their oath as a juror for the week. The trial judge swore them in as follows:
(C.R. 152.)
While the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors was in progress, the trial judge had his staff call in other persons for jury service. On November 29, 1994, the trial judge organized a second venire and administered the oath to them:
(C.R. 406.) After voir dire examination by attorneys for the State and for the defense, the trial judge stated:
(C.R. 434.)
Borden's jury was made up of persons from both venires. A check of the names of the members of the jury against those who were sworn on the two venires, shows that each member was sworn, according to the oath set forth in § 12-16-170, Ala. Code 1975. They were not sworn a second time, and they were not reminded of their earlier oath.
This Court stated in Ex parte Deramus, 721 So. 2d 242 (Ala. 1998):
Here, the record does not reflect that Borden's counsel objected during the course of the trial. The absence of an objection does not preclude this Court from reviewing Borden's claim, however, because Borden has been sentenced to death. "In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed," Rule 39(k), Ala. R. App. P., requires that this Court "notice any plain error or defect in the proceeding under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial rights of the petitioner." See Ex parte Myers, 699 So. 2d 1285, 1290 (Ala. 1997). The absence of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flowers v. State
...[Ms. CR-97-0113, June 30, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2000); Borden v. State, 769 So.2d 935 (Ala. Crim.App.1997), aff'd, 769 So.2d 950 (Ala. 2000); Arthur v. State, 711 So.2d 1031 (Ala.Crim.App.1996), aff'd, 711 So.2d 1097 (Ala.1997); May v. State, 710 So.2d 1362 (Ala.Crim.App.1997);......
-
Mitchell v. State Of Ala.
...in which the admission is sought." Smith v. State, 727 So. 2d 147, 167 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998), overruled on other grounds, Ex parte Borden, 769 So. 2d 950 (Ala. 2000)(citing Ex parte Fuller, 620 So. 2d 675 (Ala. 1993)). In Fuller, the Alabama Supreme Court set forth the following method for......
-
McNabb v. State
...809 So.2d 841 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), aff'd, 809 So.2d 865 (Ala.2001); and Borden v. State, 769 So.2d 935 (Ala.Crim.App.1997), aff'd, 769 So.2d 950 (Ala.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 961, 121 S.Ct. 389, 148 L.Ed.2d 299 (2000). The trial court shall submit an amended sentencing order in compliance ......
-
Ex parte Borden
... 769 So.2d 950 Ex parte James Henry BORDEN, Jr ... (Re James Henry Borden, Jr. v. State) ... 1972037 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... February 4, 2000 ... Rehearing Denied April 21, 2000 ... 769 So.2d 952 ... ...