Foshee v. State, CR-94-0636
Decision Date | 28 July 1995 |
Docket Number | CR-94-0636 |
Citation | 672 So.2d 1387 |
Parties | Donna Runge FOSHEE v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Carl E. Chamblee, Sr., Birmingham, for Appellant.
Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Lynda Oswald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellee.
The appellant, Donna Runge Foshee, was convicted in two cases of the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, a violation of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. For each conviction, she was sentenced to two years in the penitentiary, plus an additional five years' imprisonment pursuant to § 13A-12-250, because the sale occurred within three miles of a school. The sentences were to be served concurrently. Three issues are raised on appeal.
The appellant contends that her conviction for the sale of cocaine was not supported by the evidence.
On December 22, 1989, officers Leslie Moore and Mark Whitaker, undercover narcotics agents with the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, went to the Booby Trap Lounge in Sumiton, where the appellant worked as a topless dancer. The officers had purchased cocaine from the appellant on December 8, and they had told her that they wished to buy more. Officer Moore testified that when they arrived at the lounge on December 22, the appellant told him that she would "check on it." The appellant went into the dressing room area, but told him when she returned that she could not get cocaine because her boss no longer trusted her with it. However, the appellant told Officer Moore that a girl named Shanda would bring him the cocaine. A short time later the appellant returned to the table at which Moore and Whitaker were sitting and introduced Shanda. With the appellant present, Shanda and the officers completed a sale of one gram of cocaine.
Owes v. State, 638 So.2d 1383, 1386 (Ala.Cr.App.1993).
Here, the appellant knew that the officers wanted to buy cocaine, and she procured someone to sell it to them. This evidence is sufficient to prove her "criminal linkage" with the sale and from which the jury could conclude that the appellant participated in the sale.
The appellant also contends that there is a fatal variance between the crimes charged in the indictments and the verdicts returned by the jury.
A fatal variance between an indictment and a jury verdict occurs when the language in the indictment and the judgment charge different crimes and the variance between the two in some way harms the substantial rights of the appellant. Crowe v. State, 435 So.2d 1371 (Ala.Cr.App.1983). The indictments charged the appellant with unlawfully distributing "a controlled substance." The verdicts found the appellant guilty of unlawfully distributing "drugs." These terms are frequently used synonymously, and the appellant offered no evidence that this use of different words harmed her substantial rights. See Jefferson v. State, 473 So.2d 1100 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 473 So.2d 1110 (Ala.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 922, 107 S.Ct. 328, 93 L.Ed.2d 300 (Ala.1986) ( ). Moreover, during its oral charge, the court explicitly told the jury that "in each case the charge [against the appellant] is distribution of cocaine."...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Borden
...administration of the oath to the petit jury is required by § 12-16-170, Ala.Code 1975, as well as by Rule 18.5, Ala. R.Crim. P. Foshee v. State, 672 So.2d 1387 (Ala.Crim. App.1995). On November 28, 1994, at the Lawrence County Courthouse in Moulton, the trial judge welcomed the initial pan......
-
Borden, Jr. v. State, 1972037
...administration of the oath to the petit jury is required by § 12-16-170, Ala. Code 1975, as well as by Rule 18.5, Ala. R. Crim. P. Foshee v. State, 672 So. 2d 1387 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995). On November 28, 1994, at the Lawrence County Courthouse in Moulton, the trial judge welcomed the initia......
-
Dyson v. State
...comments to the rule. The failure to administer the oath to the jury renders the jury's verdict a nullity. See Foshee v. State, 672 So.2d 1387 (Ala.Cr.App.1995). As noted, the state's response did not refute the appellant's contention that the jury was not sworn. Moreover, the record on dir......
-
Ex Parte Lee, 1061709.
...500 So.2d 1256 (Ala.1986) ("A minute entry is deemed to be a sufficient showing that the oath was administered."); Foshee v. State, 672 So.2d 1387, 1389 (Ala.Crim. App.1995) ("Here, a minute entry on the case action summary indicates that the jury was `struck and sworn.' This is Because the......