Borkowski v. Borkowski
| Decision Date | 31 January 1972 |
| Citation | Borkowski v. Borkowski, 330 N.Y.S.2d 106, 38 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972) |
| Parties | In the Matter of Alice BORKOWSKI, Respondent-Appellant, v. Arthur BORKOWSKI, Appellant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before RABIN, P.J., and HOPKINS, MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM and GULOTTA, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a support proceeding, (1)petitioner's husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated February 23 1971, which Inter alia directed him (a) to make certain payments for support of petitioner and the parties' child, (b) to turn over $3,000 to petitioner and (2) to maintain the parties' marital permises; and (3)petitioner appeals from a further order of the same court dated June 10, 1971 which denied her motion for reargument of the proceeding.
Appeal by petitioner dismissed, without costs.An order denying reargument is not appealable (Pagliero v. Baffa, 22 A.D.2d 920, 255 N.Y.S.2d 571).
Order dated February 23, 1971 reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for reconsideration.
Insofar as the Family Court directed appellant to turn over to his wife certain monies representing her one-half interest in a joint bank account and further directed him to continue making mortgage payments on the parties' marital premises while awarding him exclusive possession, the court exceeded its jurisdiction.The Family Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and cannot exercise powers beyond those...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Thomas v. New York City
...§ 115; Emily K. v. Matthew K., 120 Misc.2d 561, 466 N.Y.S.2d 190 (Family Court, Kings County 1983); see also Borkowski v. Borkowski, 38 A.D.2d 752, 330 N.Y.S.2d 106 (2d Dep't 1972). In the instant lawsuit, plaintiffs seek monetary damages for the deprivation of their constitutional rights. ......
-
Barlett v. Fitts
...the stock ownership dispute because it was not one of the issues that could have been referred to it by the Supreme Court. See Borkowski, 38 A.D.2d at 753. This limitation is strict; in Borkowski, the held: [i]nsofar as the Family Court directed appellant to turn over to his wife certain mo......
-
Barlett v. Fitts
...the stock ownership dispute because it was not one of the issues that could have been referred to it by the Supreme Court. See Borkowski, 38 A.D.2d at 753. This limitation is strict; in Borkowski, the held: [i]nsofar as the Family Court directed appellant to turn over to his wife certain mo......
-
Barlett v. Fitts
...the stock ownership dispute because it was not one of the issues that could have been referred to it by the Supreme Court. See Borkowski, 38 A.D.2d at 753. This limitation is strict; in Borkowski, the held: [i]nsofar as the Family Court directed appellant to turn over to his wife certain mo......