Bost v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 26 July 1920 |
Docket Number | 10470. |
Parties | BOST v. VOLUNTEER STATE LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; T. S Sease, Judge.
Suit by Bess Boyd Bost against the Volunteer State Life Insurance Company. From decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Judgment reversed.
Thomas & Lumpkin, of Columbia, for appellant.
C. J Kimball and W. N. Graydon, both of Columbia, for respondent.
This is an appeal from Judge Sease's decree, made in two cases heard by him, a jury having been waived.
The suit is on two insurance policies, and the facts are identical in each. The plaintiff claimed full amount in each policy. The defendant claimed that there was a valid cancellation and surrender of these policies, prior to the death of the deceased, the insured, and that no claim can be predicated thereon, and that the insured entered the service of the United States, in the army, in violation of the provisions of the policies, and that by reason thereof the policies are void. The trial judge overruled each defense, and decreed in favor of the plaintiff the full amount of each policy.
After entry of judgment defendant appealed and by exceptions, eight in number, imputes error. The exceptions 1, 2, 3, and 4 question the holding of his honor that the insured, Berry Buford Bost, did not have the right to accept the cash-surrender value of the two policies of insurance, taken out in the defendant company in favor of his mother, Laura H Bost, as sole beneficiary without her consent, and would that bar her interest in the policies, and whether he did accept the cash-surrender value, so as to deprive the sole beneficiary of her rights, under the policies.
The conditions of the policy provide:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lane v. New York Life Ins. Co.
... ... business, and as such is authorized to carry on its business ... in the state of South Carolina ... (2) ... This defendant admits the allegations of ... change the beneficiary. It was there held, as was held in the ... case of Bost v. Insurance Co., 114 S.C. 405, 103 ... S.E. 771, in an opinion by the present Chief Justice: ... ...
-
Hamilton Ridge Lumber Corp. v. Boston Ins. Co.
... ... Notice of cancellation shall state that said excess premium ... (if not tendered) will be refunded on ... Cas. 1917B, 907 ... Our own ... case of Bost v. Volunteer Life Insurance Co., 114 ... S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, ... ...
-
Antley v. New York Life Ins. Co.
... ... in the proceeds ... Then ... came the decision in the case of Bost v. Ins. Co., ... 114 S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, decided July 26, 1920. The point ... at issue was ... action of the insured or the insurer or both ... In this ... state of conflict between the decisions, it is up to the ... court to "choose ye this day whom he will ... ...
-
Wannamaker v. Stroman
...have approved this right only where the mode prescribed in the policy was followed, or substantially followed. In Bost v. Ins. Co., 114 S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, 772, opinion by the late Chief Justice Watts, it was "By the terms of the policies the insured reserved the right to change the ben......