Bost v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date26 July 1920
Docket Number10470.
PartiesBOST v. VOLUNTEER STATE LIFE INS. CO.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; T. S Sease, Judge.

Suit by Bess Boyd Bost against the Volunteer State Life Insurance Company. From decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Judgment reversed.

Thomas & Lumpkin, of Columbia, for appellant.

C. J Kimball and W. N. Graydon, both of Columbia, for respondent.

WATTS J.

This is an appeal from Judge Sease's decree, made in two cases heard by him, a jury having been waived.

The suit is on two insurance policies, and the facts are identical in each. The plaintiff claimed full amount in each policy. The defendant claimed that there was a valid cancellation and surrender of these policies, prior to the death of the deceased, the insured, and that no claim can be predicated thereon, and that the insured entered the service of the United States, in the army, in violation of the provisions of the policies, and that by reason thereof the policies are void. The trial judge overruled each defense, and decreed in favor of the plaintiff the full amount of each policy.

After entry of judgment defendant appealed and by exceptions, eight in number, imputes error. The exceptions 1, 2, 3, and 4 question the holding of his honor that the insured, Berry Buford Bost, did not have the right to accept the cash-surrender value of the two policies of insurance, taken out in the defendant company in favor of his mother, Laura H Bost, as sole beneficiary without her consent, and would that bar her interest in the policies, and whether he did accept the cash-surrender value, so as to deprive the sole beneficiary of her rights, under the policies.

The conditions of the policy provide:

" Change of beneficiary--The insured may, at any time while this policy is in force, by written notice to the company at its home office, change the beneficiary or beneficiaries under this policy, such change to take effect only upon the indorsement of the same on the policy by the company, where upon all rights of the former beneficiary or beneficiaries shall cease: Provided, however, that no such change of beneficiary shall be valid if the policy or any interest therein be assigned at the time of such change."
"This policy is issued with the express understanding that the insured may, without the consent of the beneficiary receive every benefit, exercise every right, and enjoy every privilege conferred upon him
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Lane v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 19, 1928
    ... ... business, and as such is authorized to carry on its business ... in the state of South Carolina ...          (2) ... This defendant admits the allegations of ... change the beneficiary. It was there held, as was held in the ... case of Bost v. Insurance Co., 114 S.C. 405, 103 ... S.E. 771, in an opinion by the present Chief Justice: ... ...
  • Hamilton Ridge Lumber Corp. v. Boston Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 8, 1925
    ... ... Notice of cancellation shall state that said excess premium ... (if not tendered) will be refunded on ... Cas. 1917B, 907 ...          Our own ... case of Bost v. Volunteer Life Insurance Co., 114 ... S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, ... ...
  • Antley v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1927
    ... ... in the proceeds ...          Then ... came the decision in the case of Bost v. Ins. Co., ... 114 S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, decided July 26, 1920. The point ... at issue was ... action of the insured or the insurer or both ...          In this ... state of conflict between the decisions, it is up to the ... court to "choose ye this day whom he will ... ...
  • Wannamaker v. Stroman
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1932
    ...have approved this right only where the mode prescribed in the policy was followed, or substantially followed. In Bost v. Ins. Co., 114 S.C. 405, 103 S.E. 771, 772, opinion by the late Chief Justice Watts, it was "By the terms of the policies the insured reserved the right to change the ben......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT