Boswell v. State, 34853

Decision Date31 May 1979
Docket NumberNo. 34853,34853
Citation243 Ga. 732,256 S.E.2d 470
PartiesBOSWELL v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

James M. Watts, Milledgeville, for appellant.

Frank C. Mills, III, Dist. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Michael R. Johnson, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

HALL, Justice.

This is an out-of-time appeal from a 1973 murder conviction and life sentence.

Boswell contends that the following charges given at his trial were burden- shifting under Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975) and State v. Moore, 237 Ga. 269, 227 S.E.2d 241 (1975):

"The burden is on the defendant to establish by this (sic) preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but by a preponderance of the evidence, that at the time of the alleged offense, he was mentally irresponsible under tests that have been recognized by the law of Georgia."

"While the burden of the proof is on the defendant to establish his defense of insanity by the preponderance of the evidence as I have defined, you should, if you have a reasonable doubt as to his sanity at the time of the alleged murder charged against him was (sic) committed, you are to give him the benefit of the doubt and acquit him on those grounds."

These charges are proper under Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197, 97 S.Ct. 2319, 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977); Grace v. Hopper, 566 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.) cert. den., 439 U.S. 844, 99 S.Ct. 139, 58 L.Ed.2d 144 (1978); Pierce v. State, 243 Ga. 454, 254 S.E.2d 838 (1979); Durham v. State, 239 Ga. 697, 698, 238 S.E.2d 334 (1977).

The final enumeration of error is deemed abandoned under Rule 18(c)(2) of this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Hightower, 5-86-0594
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 26, 1988
    ...to mean that Leland does not violate the due process requirement established in Winship and Mullaney. (See Boswell v. State (1979), 243 Ga. 732, 732, 256 S.E.2d 470, 471; Price v. State (1980), 274 Ind. 479, 482, 412 N.E.2d 783, 785; In Re Certified Question (1986), 425 Mich. 457, 468, 390 ......
  • Chancellor v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 1983
    ...impermissibly shifts the burden of proof to the defendant has been rejected by the appellate courts of this state in Boswell v. State, 243 Ga. 732, 256 S.E.2d 470 and Frier v. State, 157 Ga.App. 56, 276 S.E.2d 9. Nor was it error to refuse to charge on delusional compulsion. Before such a d......
  • Scoggins v. State, 60384
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 3, 1980
    ...the defense of insanity must prove their insanity at the times in question by a preponderance of the evidence. See Boswell v. State, 243 Ga. 732, 256 S.E.2d 470 (1979); Grace v. Hopper, 566 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.) cert. den. 439 U.S. 844, 99 S.Ct. 139, 58 L.Ed.2d 144 (1978). This court will not......
  • Frier v. State, 60894
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 8, 1981
    ...227 S.E.2d 241 (1976), appellant urges that the charge is impermissibly burden shifting. This argument was rejected in Boswell v. State, 243 Ga. 732, 256 S.E.2d 470 (1979). See also State v. Avery, 237 Ga. 865, 230 S.E.2d 301 (1976); Oliver v. State, 244 Ga. 107(1), 259 S.E.2d 56 (1979); Br......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT