Bouchard v. Daily Gazette Co.
Decision Date | 25 February 2016 |
Citation | 25 N.Y.S.3d 730,136 A.D.3d 1233 |
Parties | Michael G. BOUCHARD, Appellant, v. DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Michael G. Bouchard, Latham, appellant pro se.
Nixon Peabody, LLP, Albany (Andrew C. Rose of counsel), for respondents.
Before: McCARTHY, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered September 10, 2014 in Albany County, which granted a motion by defendants Daily Gazette Company and The Daily Gazette to dismiss the complaint against them.
In November 2012, plaintiff, an attorney, was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York for alleged crimes committed in Albany, Rensselaer and Schenectady Counties. On November 30, 2012, defendants Daily Gazette Company and The Daily Gazette (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) received a Department of Justice (hereinafter DOJ) press release entitled "Attorney Convicted in Mortgage Fraud Prosecution," detailing plaintiff's charges and conviction and, later that day, published an article entitled "Albany lawyer convicted of mortgage fraud" based upon such press release. Thereafter, on November 27, 2013, plaintiff commenced this action for libel, alleging that defendants published false, libelous and defamatory statements about him in their newspaper. Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failing to state a legally viable cause of action, arguing that their article was an accurate representation of the DOJ press release and, therefore, it was privileged under Civil Rights Law § 74. Supreme Court granted such motion, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against said defendants, and plaintiff now appeals. We affirm.
Civil Rights Law § 74 provides, in relevant part, that "[a] civil action cannot be maintained against any person, firm or corporation, for the publication of a fair and true report of any judicial proceeding" and, as such, "cloaks those publishing fair and true reports of judicial proceedings with immunity from civil liability" (Hughes Training, Inc., Link Div. v. Pegasus Real–Time, 255 A.D.2d 729, 730, 680 N.Y.S.2d 721 [1998] ). "[A]n article may be characterized as ‘fair and true’ if it is substantially accurate" (Tenney v. Press–Republican, 75 A.D.3d 868, 868, 905 N.Y.S.2d 356 [2010] ; see Holy Spirit Assn. for Unification of World Christianity v. New York Times Co., 49 N.Y.2d 63, 67, 424 N.Y.S.2d 165, 399 N.E.2d 1185 [1979] ). Moreover, "[a] fair and true report admits of some liberality; the exact words of every proceeding need not be given if the substance be substantially stated" (Holy Spirit Assn. for Unification of World Christianity v. New York Times Co., 49 N.Y.2d at 67, 424 N.Y.S.2d 165, 399 N.E.2d 1185 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Briarcliff Lodge Hotel, Inc. v. Citizen–Sentinel Publs., 260 N.Y. 106, 118, 183 N.E. 193 [1932] ) and "there is ‘no requirement that a publication report the plaintiff's side of the controversy’ " (Tenney v. Press–Republican, 75 A.D.3d at 869, 905 N.Y.S.2d 356, quoting Cholowsky v. Civiletti, 69 A.D.3d 110, 115, 887 N.Y.S.2d 592 [2009] [brackets omitted] ). Minor inaccuracies are " ‘not serious enough to remove [a party's] reportage from the protection of Civil Rights Law § 74 ’ " (Misek–Falkoff v. McDonald, 63 Fed.Appx. 551, 552 [2d Cir.2003], cert. denied 541 U.S. 960, 124 S.Ct. 1723, 158 L.Ed.2d 401 [2004], quoting Misek–Falkoff v. American Lawyer Media, 300 A.D.2d 215, 216, 752 N.Y.S.2d 647 [2002], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 508, 764 N.Y.S.2d 385, 796 N.E.2d 477 [2003], cert. denied 541 U.S. 939, 124 S.Ct. 1693, 158 L.Ed.2d 360 [2004] ).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rodriguez v. Daily News, L.P.
...of World Christianity v. New York Times Co., 49 N.Y.2d 63, 67, 424 N.Y.S.2d 165, 399 N.E.2d 1185 ; Bouchard v. Daily Gazette Co., 136 A.D.3d 1233, 25 N.Y.S.3d 730 ; Saleh v. New York Post, 78 A.D.3d 1149, 1152, 915 N.Y.S.2d 571 ).The privilege is not defeated by the NYPD's error in identify......
-
Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P. v. Dow Jones & Co., INDEX NO. 151322/2018
...minor inaccuracies do not remove it from the protection of Civil Rights Law § 74. (Bouchard v Daily Gazette Co., 136 AD3d 1233, 25 N.Y.S.3d 730 [3d Dept. 2016]). A careful review of the subject article and the arbitration decision, confirm that the former is an accurate report of the latter......
- In re Mickia B.
-
In re Aiani YY.
...that they neglected the children by exposing them to domestic violence and by failing to protect them from drug abuse. During the 136 A.D.3d 1233same period of time, the children were temporarily removed from respondents' custody and placed with the paternal grandmother. Family Court therea......