Bouno v. State, 5D05-205.
| Decision Date | 08 April 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D05-205.,5D05-205. |
| Citation | 900 So.2d 672 |
| Parties | Tony BOUNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Tony Bouno, Clermont, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Appellant challenges the order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence wherein he alleges that he was the victim of a vindictive sentence. The trial court denied the motion as not being cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We agree and affirm.1 Reese v. State, 896 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 888 So.2d 621 (Fla. 2004).
In concluding as we have, we have not overlooked our recent opinion in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), wherein we remanded for further consideration a similar claim made pursuant to rule 3.800(a). A review of this court's file in that case, however, reveals that the state never raised the procedural objection that is the basis of our holding today, and that issue was not addressed in the panel opinion. Instead, the only issue addressed in Johnson was whether the lower court had correctly applied the law of the case doctrine. Therefore, our opinion today does not conflict with Johnson. See Reese.
AFFIRMED.
1. We further note that Appellant's prior unsuccessful motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850 raised this same claim. Bouno v. State, 827 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). We decline, therefore, to treat Appellant's motion as one asserted under rule 3.850.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Evans v. State
...sentence under rule 3.850 was raised. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 860 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Likewise, in Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), review denied, 925 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 2006), we held that the failure to object to a vindictive sentence could not be raised by ......
-
Morales v. State, 3D04-1832.
...that a claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised by a motion to correct illegal sentence under Rule 3.800(a). See Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).2 If the defendant's motion is treated as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, it is Accordingly, we ......
-
Jackson v. State, SC05-654.
...State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Subsequently, the Fifth District decided Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), in which the Fifth District distinguished its prior opinion in Johnson and agreed with the Second District that a claim of......
-
Kimble v. State
...claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a), we affirm. See Jackson v. State , 193 So. 3d 1, 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Bouno v. State , 900 So. 2d 672, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; Taylor v. State , 897 So. 2d 495, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; Boyd v. State , 880 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). ......