Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 7-70

Decision Date06 October 1970
Docket NumberNo. 7-70,7-70
Citation128 Vt. 593,270 A.2d 151
CourtVermont Supreme Court
PartiesLionel BOURGON, Administrator of the Estate of Gaetan Louis Bourgon v. FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Latham & Eastman, Burlington, for plaintiff.

Wick, Dinse & Allen, Burlington, for defendant.

Before HOLDEN, C. J., and SHANGRAW, BARNEY, SMITH and KEYSER, JJ.

BARNEY, Justice.

The insured drowned when the 'bushbuggy' he was driving on the frozen surface of Lake Dunmore went through the ice. The plaintiff, administrator of his estate, is seeking recovery of the death benefit, payable under a certain automobile liability insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company, now doing business as the Concord General Mutual Insurance Company.

The defendant's refusal to pay is based on its view of the measure of coverage as determined by the following two policy provisions:

COVERAGE A-DEATH INDEMNITY: To pay the principal sum stated in the schedule in the event of the death of the insured which shall result directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury caused by accident and sustained by the insured while in or upon or while entering into or alighting from, or through being struck by, an automobile * * *

AUTOMOBILE DEFINED: With respect to this insurance the word 'automobile' means a land motor vehicle or trailer not operated on rails or crawler treads, but does not mean: (1) a farm type tractor or other equipment designed for use principally off public roads, except while actually upon public roads, or (2) a land motor vehicle or trailer while located for use as a residence or premises and not as a vehicle.

The vehicle referred to as a 'bush-buggy' was actually a stripped-down Volkswagen. According to the findings, there remained of the original automobile the chassis, wheels and tires, steering column and wheel, front seats and seat belts, engine and fuel tank. It had no lights, windshield or fenders, and nothing in front of the two seats except a steering column supported by a bracket. It was not registered and could not pass the Vermont motor vehicle inspection requirements. It was not ordinarily operated on the highways, but in woodland areas, and was towed from place to place over the highway.

The findings also point out that this vehicle had at one time been registered and operated as an ordinary automobile, before the removal of body parts. The trial court found it to be definable as a 'land motor vehicle' not operated on rails or treads, originally designed for highway use, although in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • July 14, 2000
    ...discrimination or restriction, except reasonable regulation in interest of general public); cf. Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 128 Vt. 593, 595, 270 A.2d 151, 153 (1970) (frozen surface of Lake Dunmore qualifies as public road, because it is open to general circulation, although Beca......
  • State v. Trucott
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1984
    ..."a way laid out under authority of law." Examined in its entirety, § 4(13) is extremely broad. Thus, in Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 128 Vt. 593, 270 A.2d 151 (1970), a case that construes what is now § 4(13), this Court held that: "As a place 'open temporarily or permanentl......
  • State v. Eckhardt, 95-484
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • August 27, 1996
    ...public. Trucott, 145 Vt. at 283, 487 A.2d at 155. Thus, we have held that the surface of a frozen lake, Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 128 Vt. 593, 595, 270 A.2d 151, 153 (1970), the "pull-off" area of a public highway, Trucott, 145 Vt. at 283-84, 487 A.2d at 155, and a large restaur......
  • Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Daniels
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • August 10, 1981
    ...in similar circumstances held for coverage, although not all involved UM provisions. The oldest case is Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 128 Vt. 593, 270 A.2d 151 (Sup.Ct.1970), which did not involve an uninsured motorist. There plaintiff was the administrator of the insured's estate w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT