Bowden v. State

CourtFlorida Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtAuthor: Buford
CitationBowden v. State, 152 Fla. 715, 12 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1943)
Decision Date09 April 1943
PartiesBOWDEN v. STATE.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Bayard B. Shields judge.

Mabry A Carlton and John E. Lake, both of Jacksonville, for appellant.

J. Tom Watson, Atty. Gen., and Woodrow M. Melvin and John C. Wynn Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

BUFORD, Chief Justice.

On indictment charging rape, accused was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape. From judgment of conviction, appeal has been perfected to this Court.

The facts as disclosed by the record can arouse no sympathy on behalf of the appellant. We are convinced by the record and in fact, by the testimony of the appellant that he ravished and had carnal knowledge of a child of the age of thirteen years.

The record indicates, though it was not alleged in the indictment, that the victim was a unmarried female of previous chaste character.

The verdict of the jury, in effect acquitting the accused of rape and finding him guilty of assault with intent to commit rape, though contrary to the overwhelming evidence, has foreclosed the question as to penetration in favor of the accused.

The record fails to establish that the act was accomplished by force and against the will of the victim. At most, the record shows that the victim protested, but that while protesting she cooperated materially in attaining the consummation of the criminal assault.

Therefore, the judgment must be reversed with directions that the cause go back to the lower court to be certified to the Criminal Court of Record for further proceedings.

It will be...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Jimenez v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1947
    ...the jury has ignored.' See also Roberts v. State, 94 Fla. 149, 113 So. 726, Prevatt v. State, 82 Fla. 284, 89 So. 807, Bowden v. State, 152 Fla. 715, 12 So.2d 887, and 42 Corpus Juris Secundum, Indictments and Informations, § p. 1327: 'The general rule is that accused may be convicted of a ......
  • State v. Bowden
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 16, 1944
    ...of force against the will of the victim had not been proven by the State to the exclusion of and beyond a reasonable doubt. See Bowden v. State, 12 So.2d 887. Upon the mandate this court going down, the county solicitor of Duval County filed an information against the defendant charging him......
  • Merrone v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 2013
    ...of the greater offense, and double jeopardy principles bar a prosecution on the greater offense upon retrial). See also Bowden v. State, 152 Fla. 715, 12 So.2d 887 (1943), opinion after remand,154 Fla. 511, 18 So.2d 478 (1944); Jackson v. State, 449 So.2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). 9. Although......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 1959
    ...harmless because the verdict of the jury determined that there was not sufficient evidence to establish penetration. See Bowden v. State, 152 Fla. 715, 12 So.2d 887.' The trial court in its instructions gave all proper ones to indicate to the jury the difference between the conspiracy count......
  • Get Started for Free