Bowes v. Ott (In re Ott)

Decision Date05 February 1929
PartiesIN RE WILL OF MARY M. M. OTT, DECEASED. JOHN D. BOWES, EX'R, ETC., APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR F. OTT, OBJECTOR, RESPONDENT.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Milwaukee County; John C. Karel, Judge. Affirmed.

The will of Mary M. M. Ott was offered for probate in the county court of Milwaukee county by John D. Bowes, the executor named in said will. The probate of the will was contested by the son of testatrix, Arthur F. Ott, upon the ground that, at the time of the execution of said will, the deceased was mentally incompetent to make a will. From a judgment denying the probate of the will, the executor, John D. Bowes, appealed.

*452S. M. Williams and Timothy J. Hannan, both of Milwaukee, for appellant.

Wolfe & Kolinski and Timlin & Dean, all of Milwaukee, for respondent.

OWEN, J.

Mr. Chief Justice VINJE did not participate in this case. The justices participating are equally divided. Mr. Justice ESCHWEILER, Mr. Justice DOERFLER, and Mr. Justice CROWNHART are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice ROSENBERRY, Mr. Justice STEVENS, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under the established rule, this results in an affirmance of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

a1. Rehearing denied April 2, 1929, with $25 costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Smith v. Kleynerman
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • March 21, 2017
    ...Wis. 570, 219 N.W. 270 (1928) (on appeal).26. Barteck v. Rotter , 197 Wis. 303, 222 N.W. 221 (1928) (on appeal).27. In re Ott's Will , 198 Wis. 55, 223 N.W. 452 (1929) (on appeal).28. Estate of Byrne , 201 Wis. 76, 228 N.W. 436 (1930) (on appeal).29. Olson v. Cunningham , 200 Wis. 610, 228 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT