Smith v. Kleynerman

Decision Date21 March 2017
Docket NumberCase No.: 2015AP207
Citation892 N.W.2d 734 (Mem),374 Wis.2d 1
Parties Scott SMITH, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Alpha Cargo Technology, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Greg KLEYNERMAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, Red Flag Cargo Security Systems, LLC, Defendant.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

For the Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, Greg Kleynerman, there were briefs filed by Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., Max B. Chester and Philip C. Babler, Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Thomas L. Shriner.

For the Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Scott Smith, there was a brief filed by Timothy M. Hansen, Andrew J. Kramer, Danielle M. Nardick and Hansen Reynolds LLC, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Andrew J. Kramer.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

¶2 DANIEL KELLY, J., did not participate.

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (concurring).

¶3 I write separately to preserve institutional and historical memory. This is the first case since 1979 resulting in a tie vote in which the court does not state the names of the participating justices and each of the justices' votes in the case.

¶4 A total of 115 cases from 1885 through 2016 present the names and votes of each participating justice. See Attachment A.

¶5 A total of 26 cases from 1849 through 1979 do not present the names and votes of each participating justice. See Attachment B.

¶6 These attachments demonstrate, even if my internet search might have missed some cases, that the court is changing its recent and historically dominant practice with this per curiam. The court gives no explanation for this change.

¶7 From my perspective, consistency is important. If a court is not consistent in its practice about reporting tie votes, then I believe the court should explain why the voting information is revealed in a particular case and in another it is not.

¶8 High courts in other states differ in their practice about setting forth the names of the justices and the votes cast in tie vote cases. The United States Supreme Court does not set forth the line-up of the justices when a tie vote exists.

ATTACHMENT A

Equally Divided Court:

Cases Naming Justices

1. Zwickey v. Haney , 63 Wis. 464, 23 N.W. 577 (1885) (on appeal).
2. Church of the Good Shepherd v. Racine Water Co. , 116 Wis. 11, 92 N.W. 436 (1902) (on appeal).
3. Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Ry. Co. , 118 Wis. 148, 93 N.W. 1135 (1903) (on appeal).
4. Gibbs v. Seibt , 118 Wis. 145, 93 N.W. 1097 (1903) (on appeal).
5. Jacobs v. Queen Ins. Co. of Am. , 123 Wis. 608, 101 N.W. 1090 (1905) (on appeal).
6. Cook v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S.S.M. Ry. Co. , 125 Wis. 528, 103 N.W. 1097 (1905) (on appeal).
7. Zohrlaut v. Mengelberg , 148 Wis. 592, 134 N.W. 1135 (1912) (on appeal).
8. Nelson v. Fairchild & N.E. R. Co. , 163 Wis. 300, 156 N.W. 943 (1916) (on appeal).
9. Wis. Chair Co. v. Industrial Comm'n of Wis. , 163 Wis. 25, 157 N.W. 1103 (1916) (on appeal).
10. Faust Lumber Co. v. Industrial Comm'n of Wis. , 163 Wis. 365, 157 N.W. 1103 (1916) (on appeal).
11. In re Carter's Estate , 167 Wis. 89, 166 N.W. 657 (1918) (on appeal).
12. Rathenberger v. Jacob , 167 Wis. 273, 167 N.W. 271 (1918) (on appeal).
13. Johnston v. City of West Allis , 173 Wis. 463, 180 N.W. 121 (1920) (on appeal).
14. Racine Auto Tire Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Wis. , 173 Wis. 118, 180 N.W. 124 (1920) (on appeal).
15. Gruhl Sash & Door Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. , 173 Wis. 215, 180 N.W. 845 (1921) (on appeal).
16. In re Saveland's Will , 173 Wis. 328, 181 N.W. 209 (1921) (on appeal).
17. South Side Malleable Co. v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co. , 174 Wis. 93, 181 N.W. 749 (1921) (on appeal).
18. Kahn v. Melaney , 174 Wis. 95, 181 N.W. 737 (1921) (on appeal).
19. Kroner v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of Am. , 176 Wis. 151, 184 N.W. 1037 (1921) (on appeal).
20. Griffin v. Milwaukee Elec. Ry. & Light Co. , 176 Wis. 179, 185 N.W. 639 (1921) (on appeal).
21. State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wis. Telephone Co. , 181 Wis. 519, 195 N.W. 544 (1923) (on appeal).
22. Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm'n , 189 Wis. 626, 208 N.W. 266 (1926) (on appeal).
23. Schafer & Olson v. Varney , 191 Wis. 186, 210 N.W. 359 (1926) (on appeal).
24. Morse v. State , 193 Wis. 495, 215 N.W. 216 (1927) (on appeal).
25. Boehlke v. Wallschlaeger , 196 Wis. 570, 219 N.W. 270 (1928) (on appeal).
26. Barteck v. Rotter , 197 Wis. 303, 222 N.W. 221 (1928) (on appeal).
27. In re Ott's Will , 198 Wis. 55, 223 N.W. 452 (1929) (on appeal).
28. Estate of Byrne , 201 Wis. 76, 228 N.W. 436 (1930) (on appeal).
29. Olson v. Cunningham , 200 Wis. 610, 228 N.W. 895 (1930) (on appeal).
30. Spring Creek Threshing Co. v. Amundson , 202 Wis. 150, 231 N.W. 628 (1930) (on appeal).
31. Bender v. Bain , 227 Wis. 454, 278 N.W. 864 (1938) (on appeal).
32. Carpenter Baking Co. v. Bakery Sales Drivers Local Union , 238 Wis. 367, 299 N.W. 30 (1941) (on appeal).
33. In re Gerlach's Will , 239 Wis. 353, 300 N.W. 476 (1941) (on appeal).
34. Banking Comm'n of Wis. v. Rothe , 239 Wis. 529, 2 N.W.2d 220 (1942) (on appeal).
35. Radtke Bros. & Kortsch Co. v. Indus. Comm'n , 240 Wis. 410, 3 N.W.2d 679 (1942) (on appeal).
36. Int'l Harvester Co. v. Wis. Dep't of Taxation , 243 Wis. 198, 10 N.W.2d 169 (1943) (on appeal).
37. In re Razall's Will , 245 Wis. 416, 14 N.W.2d 764 (1944) (on appeal).
38. Fed. Refrigerator Mfg. Co. v. Crowley , 252 Wis. 532, 32 N.W.2d 351 (1948) (on appeal).
39. In re Klofanda's Will , 252 Wis. 541, 32 N.W.2d 220 (1948) (on appeal).
40. Carley v. Jewett , 253 Wis. 630, 34 N.W.2d 779 (1948) (on appeal).
41. Halvorson v. Connors , 253 Wis. 629, 34 N.W.2d 778 (1948) (on appeal).
42. City of Lake Geneva v. Walworth Cty. , 258 Wis. 495, 46 N.W.2d 767 (1951) (on appeal).
43. Wis. Elec. Power Co. v. City of Milwaukee , 263 Wis. 111, 56 N.W.2d 784 (1953) (on appeal).
44. Mahringer v. Knoeller , 9 Wis.2d 7, 100 N.W.2d 371 (1960) (on appeal).
45. Barker v. Retail Credit Co. , 8 Wis.2d 664, 100 N.W.2d 391 (1960) (on appeal).
46. Village of Brown Deer v. City of Milwaukee , 16 Wis.2d 206, 114 N.W.2d 493 (1962) (on appeal).
47. State v. Roggensack , 20 Wis.2d 468, 122 N.W.2d 408 (1963) (on appeal).
48. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. McDowell , 25 Wis.2d 99, 130 N.W.2d 203 (1964) (on appeal).
49. Graebner v. Wis. Indus. Comm'n , 27 Wis.2d 142, 133 N.W.2d 810 (1965) (on appeal).
50. Foregger v. Foregger , 28 Wis.2d 505, 137 N.W.2d 409 (1965) (on appeal).
51. Smith v. State , 41 Wis.2d 145, 163 N.W.2d 8 (1968) (on appeal).
52. State v. White , 59 Wis.2d 354, 208 N.W.2d 321 (1973) (on appeal).
53. State v. Kline , 73 Wis.2d 337, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976) (on appeal).
54. Brown v. State , 73 Wis.2d 351, 243 N.W.2d 519 (1976) (on appeal).
55. Punches v. S chmid t , 73 Wis.2d 206, 243 N.W.2d 518 (1976) (on appeal).
56. State v. Bal e strieri , 96 Wis.2d 361, 291 N.W.2d 579 (1980) (on petition for review).
57. Herwig v. Enerson & Eggen , 101 Wis.2d 170, 303 N.W.2d 669 (1981) (on petition for review).
58. Frito-Lay v. LIRC , 101 Wis.2d 169, 303 N.W.2d 668 (1981) (on petition for review).
59. State ex rel. Badger Produce Co., Inc. v. Equal Opportunities Comm'n , 1982 WL 11213 (unpublished per curiam).
60.
Local 2 57 v. Wilson Street E. Dinner Playhouse, Inc. , 126 Wis.2d 284, 375 N.W.2d 664 (1985) (on certification).
61. In Interest of R.H. , 150 Wis.2d 432, 441 N.W.2d 233 (1989) (on petition for review).
62. Wis. Public Serv. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Wis. , 174 Wis.2d 705, 497 N.W.2d 723 (1993) (on bypass).
63. State v. Young , 191 Wis.2d 393, 528 N.W.2d 417 (1995) (on petition for review).
64. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc. , 191 Wis.2d 395, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (on certification).
65. State v. Ameritech Corp. , 193 Wis.2d 150, 532 N.W.2d 449 (1995) (on petition for review).
66. State v. Wills , 193 Wis.2d 273, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995) (on petition for review).
67. State v. Elam , 195 Wis.2d 683, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (on bypass).
68. Ware v. Schoone , 199 Wis.2d 712, 546 N.W.2d 142 (1996) (on petition for review).
69. State ex rel. Thompson v. Jackson , 199 Wis.2d 714, 546 N.W.2d 140 (1996) (original action).
70. Ives v. Coopertools , 208 Wis.2d 55, 559 N.W.2d 571 (1997) (on petition for review).
71. State v. Wis. Cent. Transp. Corp. , 209 Wis.2d 278, 562 N.W.2d 152 (1997) (on petition for review).
72. State v. Watson , 209 Wis.2d 281, 562 N.W.2d 151 (1997) (on certification).
73. DeRuyter v. Wis. Elec. Power Co. , 211 Wis.2d 169, 565 N.W.2d 118 (1997) (on petition for review).
74. Moulas v. PBC Productions, Inc. , 217 Wis.2d 449, 576 N.W.2d 929 (1998) (on petition for review).
75. Eneman v. Richter , 224 Wis.2d 258, 589 N.W.2d 414 (1999) (on petition for review).
76. State v. Deborah J.Z. , 225 Wis.2d 33, 590 N.W.2d 711 (1999) (on certification).
77. State ex rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand , 226 Wis.2d 271, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999) (on petition for review).
78. In re Commitment of Thomas , 231 Wis.2d 241, 603 N.W.2d 84 (1999) (on petition for review).
79. Douglas-Hanson Co., Inc. v. BF Goodrich Co. , 2000 WI 22, 233 Wis.2d 276, 607 N.W.2d 621 (on petition for review).
80. State v. Longcore , 2000 WI 23, 233 Wis.2d 278, 607 N.W.2d 620 (on petition for review).
81. Guzman v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc. , 2000 WI 34, 234 Wis.2d 170, 609 N.W.2d 166 (on bypass).
82. State v. Strong , 2000 WI 50, 235 Wis.2d 379, 611 N.W.2d 457 (on petition for review).
83. Powell v. Cooper , 2001 WI 10, 241 Wis.2d 153, 622 N.W.2d 265 (on petition for review).
84. State ex rel. Marberry v. Macht , 2001 WI 19, 241 Wis.2d 695, 623 N.W.2d 135 (on certification).
85. State v. Bond , 2001 WI 56, 243 Wis.2d 476, 627 N.W.2d 484 (on petition for review).
86. In re Commitment of Schulpius , 2001 WI 69, 244 Wis.2d 401, 628 N.W.2d 349 (on bypass).
87. S.J.A.J. v. First Things First, Ltd. , 2001 WI 118, 247 Wis.2d 1029, 635 N.W.2d 292 (on petition for review).
88. Servais v. Kraft Foods, Inc. , 2002 WI 42, 252 Wis.2d 145, 643 N.W.2d 92 (on petition for review).
89. State v. Greer , 2003 WI 20, 260 Wis.2d 43, 658 N.W.2d 795 (on certification).
90. State v.
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Melchert v. Pro Elec. Contractors
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • April 7, 2017
  • Raab v. Wendel, Case No. 16-CV-1396
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • March 6, 2019
    ...to determine whether members of a limited liability company owe fiduciary obligations to each other. In Smith v. Kleynerman, 2017 WI 22, 374 Wis. 2d 1, 892 N.W.2d 734, the owner of a fifty percent interest in a limited liability company sued the company's other fifty percent owner, alleging......
  • In re Kleynerman
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • May 25, 2020
    ...of fiduciary duty but was not successful. An equally divided state supreme court denied his petition for review. Smith v. Kleynerman , 374 Wis. 2d 1, 892 N.W.2d 734 (2017).2 These business loans include eight different debts owed to Glaser – one directly owed by Kleynerman, two owed by Tres......
  • Wingra Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Burial Sites Pres. Bd., 2014AP2498
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 22, 2018
    ...divided court.¶ 2 DANIEL KELLY, J., withdrew from participation. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (concurring).¶ 3 As I did last term in Smith v. Kleynerman,1 I write separately to preserve institutional and historical memory.¶ 4 In the instant case, the court is equally divided on the question of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT