Smith v. Kleynerman
Decision Date | 21 March 2017 |
Docket Number | Case No.: 2015AP207 |
Citation | 892 N.W.2d 734 (Mem),374 Wis.2d 1 |
Parties | Scott SMITH, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Alpha Cargo Technology, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Greg KLEYNERMAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, Red Flag Cargo Security Systems, LLC, Defendant. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
For the Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent-Petitioner, Greg Kleynerman, there were briefs filed by Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., Max B. Chester and Philip C. Babler, Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Thomas L. Shriner.
For the Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Scott Smith, there was a brief filed by Timothy M. Hansen, Andrew J. Kramer, Danielle M. Nardick and Hansen Reynolds LLC, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Andrew J. Kramer.
¶3 I write separately to preserve institutional and historical memory. This is the first case since 1979 resulting in a tie vote in which the court does not state the names of the participating justices and each of the justices' votes in the case.
¶4 A total of 115 cases from 1885 through 2016 present the names and votes of each participating justice. See Attachment A.
¶5 A total of 26 cases from 1849 through 1979 do not present the names and votes of each participating justice. See Attachment B.
¶6 These attachments demonstrate, even if my internet search might have missed some cases, that the court is changing its recent and historically dominant practice with this per curiam. The court gives no explanation for this change.
¶7 From my perspective, consistency is important. If a court is not consistent in its practice about reporting tie votes, then I believe the court should explain why the voting information is revealed in a particular case and in another it is not.
¶8 High courts in other states differ in their practice about setting forth the names of the justices and the votes cast in tie vote cases. The United States Supreme Court does not set forth the line-up of the justices when a tie vote exists.
Equally Divided Court:
Cases Naming Justices
To continue reading
Request your trial- Melchert v. Pro Elec. Contractors
-
Raab v. Wendel, Case No. 16-CV-1396
...to determine whether members of a limited liability company owe fiduciary obligations to each other. In Smith v. Kleynerman, 2017 WI 22, 374 Wis. 2d 1, 892 N.W.2d 734, the owner of a fifty percent interest in a limited liability company sued the company's other fifty percent owner, alleging......
-
In re Kleynerman
...of fiduciary duty but was not successful. An equally divided state supreme court denied his petition for review. Smith v. Kleynerman , 374 Wis. 2d 1, 892 N.W.2d 734 (2017).2 These business loans include eight different debts owed to Glaser – one directly owed by Kleynerman, two owed by Tres......
-
Wingra Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Burial Sites Pres. Bd., 2014AP2498
...divided court.¶ 2 DANIEL KELLY, J., withdrew from participation. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (concurring).¶ 3 As I did last term in Smith v. Kleynerman,1 I write separately to preserve institutional and historical memory.¶ 4 In the instant case, the court is equally divided on the question of......