Bowling on Behalf of Morgan v. Coney

Decision Date31 January 1983
PartiesIn the Matter of Lois V. BOWLING, Commissioner on Behalf of Chad MORGAN, Appellant, v. Amos CONEY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Daniel J. Molik, Warsaw, for appellant.

Philip A. McBride, Warsaw, for respondent.

Before DILLON, P.J., and DOERR, DENMAN, BOOMER and SCHNEPP, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner, Lois V. Bowling, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of Wyoming County, appeals from an order of Family Court that dismissed her petition to establish the paternity of the child born to Peggy Morgan on June 22, 1979. At the trial, the mother testified that she lived with respondent, Amos Coney, for a period of six months and had regular and frequent intercourse with him during that time. She was confused about the date on which their relationship ended. She variously testified that it was July, August, and October of 1978. Nevertheless, she was unequivocal in her testimony that she lived with the plaintiff for a period of six months and that when she told him she was pregnant he left for Florida. She also testified that she had intercourse with no one but respondent during the six-month period she was living with him and until three months after she became pregnant. Ms. Morgan's sister testified that she lived with Ms. Morgan and the respondent; that the respondent was sleeping with her sister; and that he left in November. The result of a human leucocyte antigen (HLA) blood test was received in evidence and indicates that there was a 99.4% probability that respondent was the father. This test is highly accurate on the issue of paternity (Matter of Sherry K. v. Carpenter, 90 A.D.2d 687, 455 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Karen v. Christopher D., 86 A.D.2d 633, 634, 446 N.Y.S.2d 346), and should be accorded great weight in this case. Respondent chose not to testify, and hence we may draw the strongest inferences against him that petitioner's evidence permits (Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of Erie County v. Simons, 87 A.D.2d 993, 450 N.Y.S.2d 126; Matter of Jay v. Andrew "Y", 48 A.D.2d 716, 367 N.Y.S.2d 333; Matter of W. v. D., 36 A.D.2d 455, 459, 324 N.Y.S.2d 333). Based upon the entire record, we find the evidence to be clear and convincing that respondent is the father of the child born to Peggy Morgan.

Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to Family Court, Wyoming County, for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Department of Social Services on Behalf of Sandra C. v. Thomas J.S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 d1 Março d1 1984
    ...507; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v. Stephen H., 94 A.D.2d 936, 464 N.Y.S.2d 66; Matter of Bowling v. Coney, 91 A.D.2d 1195, 459 N.Y.S.2d 183; Matter of Sherry K. v. Carpenter, 90 A.D.2d 687, 688, 455 N.Y.S.2d 863; Matter of Joanne O. v. Andrew H.W., 87 A.D.2d 6......
  • Angela B. v. Glenn D.
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • 15 d4 Novembro d4 1984
    ...B., 112 Misc.2d 487, 448 N.Y.S.2d 351; Matter of Alicia C. v. Evaristo G., 93 A.D.2d 820, 460 N.Y.S.2d 616; Matter of Bowling, v. Coney, 91 A.D.2d 1195, 459 N.Y.S.2d 183; Matter of Kimiecik v. Daryl E., 87 A.D.2d 284, 452 N.Y.S.2d 717.3 Cf. La Croix v. Deyo, 113 Misc.2d 89, 447 N.Y.S.2d 864......
  • Nassar on behalf of Brosemer v. Lake
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • 14 d1 Maio d1 1984
    ...to have a high degree of probative value. They are to be afforded great weight by the bench and the bar. Matter of Bowling v. Coney, 91 A.D.2d 1195, 1196, 459 N.Y.S.2d 183, 194 (1983); Matter of Kimiecik v. Daryl E., 87 A.D.2d 284, 285, 452 N.Y.S.2d 717, 718 (1982). The overall standard of ......
  • Barbara A. v. Gerard J.
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • 26 d1 Março d1 1990
    ...of paternity, it is clear in the case of HLA testing that the results must be accorded great weight. (Bowling on Behalf of Morgan v. Coney, 91 A.D.2d 1195, 459 N.Y.S.2d 183 [Fourth Dept. 1983]; Nassar on Behalf of Brosemer v. Lake, 124 Misc.2d 248, 476 N.Y.S.2d 248 [Family Ct.1984]. Indeed,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT