Bowman v. Bowman, 20608
Decision Date | 09 October 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 20608,20608 |
Citation | 111 S.E.2d 36,215 Ga. 459 |
Parties | Dora Lee BOWMAN, Administratrix, v. Joanne W. BOWMAN et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Jas. L. Moore, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
Margaret H. Fairleigh, Poole, Pearce & Hall, Atlanta, for defendants in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
1. By her action in ejectment brought in Fulton Superior Court in the fictitious form, with Dora Lee Bowman, administratrix, as real party, the plaintiff claims title to described property by reason of three demises, to wit:
First, as devisee under the will of Frank K. Bowman. The property was set aside as a year's support to the defendant, Joanne W. Bowman, the widow of Frank K. Bowman, by the Court of Ordinary of Fulton County after a decision by the Court of Appeals (Bowman v. Bowman, 79 Ga.App 240, 53 S.E.2d 244), holding that the ordinary had erroneously reinstated a caveat to the return of the appraiser. This was a final judgment placing title to the property in Joanne W. Bowman. That judgment is superior to the claim of title of the plaintiff as devisee under the will of the defendant's husband.
Second, by reason of a deed to secure debt from Frank K. Bowman, dated April 27, 1946, to Fred E. Bowman, the plaintiff's intestate, conveying as security for a debt the property at issue. By decree of DeKalb Superior Court, dated June 7, 1957, it was adjudged and decreed that said deed to secure debt was valid; that a stated amount was due thereon; and, that amount having been paid into court, that the deed to secure debt had been fully satisfied. A copy of the decree was ordered filed in the Superior Court of DeKalb County as a final satisfaction and cancellation of said deed to secure debt. Upon appeal, this judgment was affirmed by this court. Bowman v. Poole, 213 Ga. 867, 102 S.E.2d 561. The matter is res judicata. No valid claim to title in the plaintiff is established under the second demise.
Third, by reason of a quitclaim deed, dated May, 1948, from Frank K. Bowman to Fred E. Bowman. In a proceeding brought by Joanne W. Bowman against Fred E. Bowman, individually and as executrix of the estate of Frank K. Bowman, deceased, in Fulton Superior Court, this deed was declared to be null and void. That judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia (Bowman v. Bowman, 210 Ga. 259, 78 S.E.2d 801), and certiorari thereon to the Supreme Court of the United States was denied. Bowman v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dillard v. Brannan
...the question to be one of law only, affidavits are not essential prerequisites to the granting of a summary judgment. See Bowman v. Bowman, 215 Ga. 459, 111 S.E.2d 36. Judgment All the Justices concur. ...
-
Park v. Minton
...in the widow in a year's support proceeding is superior to the claim of title of a devisee under the will of her husband. Bowman v. Bowman, 215 Ga. 456, 111 S.E.2d 36. If J. O. Minton, after his marriage to Eunice C. Minton, had devised the property described in the complaint to the appella......
- Allen v. State, 20592