Bowman v. State, 96-00225
| Decision Date | 27 August 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-00225,96-00225 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2061 Robert M. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Robert M. Bowman challenges the amount of restitution he was ordered to pay as a result of his theft of a 1991 Honda all-terrain vehicle (ATV). Because the State failed to carry its burden of presenting all relevant evidence to demonstrate the amount of the loss, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
At the restitution hearing, an Allstate claims adjuster testified that Allstate paid $2,942.20 to its insured, James Elliott, for the theft of his ATV. This figure was Allstate's estimated cash value of the ATV at the time of the taking, minus a $100 deductible. Allstate sought to recover the total amount paid for the claim from the defendant as restitution. The State presented no other witnesses.
The defendant testified that the sheriff's office recovered the ATV when the defendant was arrested. The State did not rebut this testimony. Although it cannot be determined with certainty from this record, we assume, and the parties argue in their briefs, that the ATV was returned to the victim, James Elliott. Where stolen property is recovered, the amount of restitution ordered must be offset by the salvage value of the property returned. See M.E.I. v. State, 525 So.2d 467, 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The State failed to present any evidence regarding the condition of the ATV when it was recovered and whether it had any salvage value which should have been deducted from the amount Allstate paid to Elliot.
The defendant argues that the state failed to carry its burden of proving the amount of loss caused by the theft. We agree. A defendant may not be ordered to pay restitution in excess of the damages caused by his criminal conduct. See Mansingh v. State, 588 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The purpose of restitution is to make the victim whole, not to make him better off than before the theft. See Branker v. State, 650 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Allstate was awarded restitution only by virtue of being subrogated to the rights of the real victim, James Elliott. See Amison v. State, 504 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Therefore, Allstate's restitution claim is limited to the amount of Elliott's loss. In this case, it appears that Elliott received both the insurance proceeds as well as the recovered ATV. If the recovered ATV has any value, Elliott is now...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Town Prosecutor's Office v. Downie
...permit reductions in restitution for value conferred on the victim. E.g., Beavers, 3 P.3d at 616 (citing Bowman v. State, 698 So.2d 615, 616 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.1997)); Tzitzikalakis, 832 N.Y.S.2d 120, 864 N.E.2d at 46. In Tzitzikalakis, for example, the defendant owned a construction company......
-
People v. Tzitzikalakis
...equation, the amount taken minus the benefit conferred (see State v. Beavers, 300 Mont. 49, 53, 3 P.3d 614, 616 [2000]; Bowman v. State, 698 So.2d 615, 616 [Fla.App.1997]; State v. Tutor, 538 N.W.2d 894, 897 [Iowa App.1995]).3 To hold otherwise would contravene both the words and the intent......
-
State v. Castro
...1999) (defendant not liable for restitution of stolen property found and recovered on defendant's person upon arrest); Bowman v. State, 698 So.2d 615 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (defendant only responsible for value of property recovered as offset by property's salvage value). Any other conclusion w......
-
Santana v. State, 5D01-118.
...of the issue before us is the failure of the State to submit evidence of the salvage value of the motorcycle. In Bowman v. State, 698 So.2d 615 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), the stolen ATV was recovered and presumably returned to the victim. The appellate court held that "[w]here stolen property is r......