Bowman v. Town of Granite Falls, 7425DC121
| Citation | 21 N.C.App. 333,204 S.E.2d 239 |
| Decision Date | 17 April 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 7425DC121,7425DC121 |
| Parties | Josse O. BOWMAN v. The TOWN OF GRANITE FALLS. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US) |
West & Groome by Ted G. West, Lenoir for plaintiff appellee.
L. H. Wall, Lenoir, and L. M. Abernethy, Granite Falls, for defendant appellant.
Rule 19 of the Rules of Practice in the North Carolina Court of Appeals specifies that the proceedings of the trial court shall be set forth in the record on appeal in the order of the time in which they occurred, and the processes, orders, and documents in the record on appeal shall follow each other in the order in which they were filed. The record in the case at bar was not properly arranged. Nevertheless, we have decided to reach the merits.
Defendant assigns as error the denial by the trial court of its motion for directed verdict. The stated grounds of the motion were that governmental immunity existed and that plaintiff had failed to show that a hazard existed or that the town knew a hazard existed.
In the absence of a statutory provision to the contrary, a municipality may not ordinarily be held liable for torts committed in the performance of a governmental function. Stone v. City of Fayetteville, 3 N.C.App. 261, 164 S.E.2d 542 (1968). Under G.S. § 160A--296 a municipality may be held liable for negligent or wanton failure to keep its streets in proper repair and in a reasonably safe condition. McClellan v. City of Concord, 16 N.C.App. 136, 191 S.E.2d 430 (1972). However, in the case at bar the tree was not located in the street or in any part of Woodlane Street which the city had accepted. The tree was in the area left by the land developer for street purposes, but that part had not been accepted and was still private property over which the city had no control and to which it owed no duty. See Taylor v. Hertford, 253 N.C. 541, 117 S.E.2d 469 (1960).
Furthermore, notice of the defect, actual or constructive, and a failure to act on the part of the municipality to remedy the situation are prerequisites to recovery in an action involving a municipality. Faw v. North Wilkesboro, 253 N.C. 406, 117 S.E.2d 14 (1960). McClelland v. City of Concord, Supra. The plaintiff testified, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Campbell v. City of High Point
...to remedy the situation are prerequisites to recovery in an action involving a municipality." Bowman v. Town of Granite Falls, 21 N.C.App. 333, 334-35, 204 S.E.2d 239, 240-41 (1974) (citing Faw v. North Wilkesboro, 253 N.C. 406, 117 S.E.2d 14 (1960)); see also, Rice v. City of Lumberton, 23......
-
Beckles-Palomares v. Logan
...summary judgment because there was no evidence that it had notice of the alleged obstructions. See Bowman v. Town of Granite Falls, 21 N.C.App. 333, 334-35, 204 S.E.2d 239, 240-41 (1974) (holding "notice of the defect, actual or constructive, and a failure to act on the part of the municipa......
-
Ladd v. Funderburk
...property and near a street did not create an affirmative duty under Section 160A before the tree fell onto a car. 21 N.C. App. 333, 334, 204 S.E.2d 239, 240 (1974). The present case aligns more with Bowman . The Section 160A affirmative duty does not require preventative measures for trees ......
-
Ladd v. Funderburk
...... TOWN OF MATTHEWS, NORTH CAROLINA, Third-Party ... suit when a tree on private property falls upon a vehicle. traveling on a public street. . 2. . ... 244, 688 S.E.2d 758, 764 (2010). Conversely, in Bowman v. Town of Granite Falls, we held that a potentially. ......