Boyd v. Crawford, A97A2568.
Decision Date | 12 March 1998 |
Docket Number | No. A97A2568.,A97A2568. |
Citation | 498 S.E.2d 762,231 Ga. App. 169 |
Parties | BOYD v. CRAWFORD. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Jim Boyd, pro se.
Deming, Parker, Hoffman, Green & Campbell, James R. Green, Jr., Norcross, for appellee
James Boyd filed this appeal, pro se, from a superior court judgment affirming a probate court order granting Michelle D. Crawford's petition for letters of administration of the estate of Christopher Allen Boyd ("the estate"), dismissing Boyd's caveat to Crawford's petition, and dismissing Boyd's application for issuance of letters of administration of the estate. The superior court's order and judgment provides as follows:
"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the decision of the Probate Court of Barrow County is affirmed and Letters of Administration issued by the Probate Court to [Crawford] shall stand as originally granted."1 Held:
1. Crawford filed a motion for our Court to expedite the case sub judice, arguing that Boyd's appeal delays settlement of a tort action which will bring revenue into the estate. This allegation, however, provides no basis for this Court to exercise its inherent power to place the case sub judice before other matters which are also regularly before this Court. Compare Shore v. Shore, 253 Ga. 183, 184, 318 S.E.2d 57; Stuckey v. Richardson, 188 Ga.App. 147, 148, 372 S.E.2d 458. Accordingly, Crawford's motion to expedite this appeal is hereby denied.
2. Boyd contends in his second enumeration of error that the superior court erred in failing to grant his application for issuance of letters of administration, arguing that a majority of the heirs selected him to serve as administrator of the estate.
A directed verdict is authorized only when "there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict...." OCGA § 9-11-50(a). A grant of directed verdict is a ruling that the evidence and all reasonable deductions therefrom demand a particular verdict. OCGA 9-11-50(a). Other than unauthenticated notes, letters and filings,...
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Heitzmann
-
Denney v. Crenshaw
...court may dismiss a civil action without prejudice for failure to appear at a peremptory calendar call."); Boyd v. Crawford , 231 Ga. App. 169, 170-171 (3), 498 S.E.2d 762 (1998) ("[Because] the superior court's order states that it is partly based on [the] unexcused absence from court, the......
- Thomas v. State
-
Truitt v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF AUGUSTA, A98A1072.
...to control the conduct of everyone connected with a judicial proceeding before that court. OCGA § 15-1-3(3) and (4). Boyd v. Crawford, 231 Ga.App. 169, 498 S.E.2d 762 (1998), is not to the contrary. In Boyd, a de novo appeal of a probate court judgment, we held the trial court improperly en......