Boyd v. Robeson County, 221P05.

Decision Date30 June 2005
Docket NumberNo. 221P05.,221P05.
Citation615 S.E.2d 866
PartiesBOYD v. ROBESON COUNTY, et al.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of May 2005 by Amicus for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Dismissed as Moot by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Jane Doe v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 21 Agosto 2012
    ...overruling on other grounds recognized in Boyd v. Robeson Cty., 169 N.C.App. 460, 470, 621 S.E.2d 1, 7,disc. review denied,359 N.C. 629, 615 S.E.2d 866 (2005)), disc. review denied,363 N.C. 372, 678 S.E.2d 234 (2009). Although Plaintiff acknowledges that, in the event that “the trial judge ......
  • Bynum v. Wilson Cnty.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 18 Junio 2013
    ...806, 690 S.E.2d 705 (2010). As we noted in Boyd v. Robeson Cty., 169 N.C.App. 460, 464–65, 621 S.E.2d 1, 4,disc. review denied,359 N.C. 629, 615 S.E.2d 866 (2005): [T]he question of whether a governmental entity is a “person” under [42 U.S.C.] § 1983 is analogous to the public duty doctrine......
  • Dailey v. Popma
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 17 Junio 2008
    ...would be lost without immediate review." Boyd v. Robeson County, 169 N.C.App. 460, 464, 621 S.E.2d 1, 4, disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 629, 615 S.E.2d 866 (2005). The burden rests on the appellant to establish the basis for an interlocutory appeal. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture, 11......
  • News & Observer Publ'g Co. v. McCrory
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 20 Diciembre 2016
    ...363 N.C. 806, 690 S.E.2d 705 (2010) ; Boyd v. Robeson Cty ., 169 N.C.App. 460, 464–65, 621 S.E.2d 1, 4, disc. review denied , 359 N.C. 629, 615 S.E.2d 866 (2005) ), rev'd in part on other grounds , 367 N.C. 355, 758 S.E.2d 643 (2014).6 At oral argument before this Court, the Administration ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT