Boykin v. State
| Decision Date | 18 March 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. W-105,W-105 |
| Citation | 309 So.2d 211 |
| Parties | David Freeman BOYKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Steven E. Rohan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Noe v. State
...of the trier of fact, and if supported by competent and substantial evidence, may not be reversed on appeal. Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Miranda rights do not commence upon the discovery of facts justifying an arrest, or because a person is the focus of a criminal in......
-
Younger v. State, 82-248
...for consent and, at best, conflicting evidence as to whether the officers threatened to obtain a search warrant. See Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (ample testimony, albeit conflicting, supported trial court's conclusion that consent to search was Appellant next contends......
-
Tarver v. State
...evidence will not be disturbed on appeal if that determination is supported by substantial, competent evidence. Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211, 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). This court is to review de novo whether the trial court's application of the law to the historical facts establishes an ad......
-
McCloud v. State, 76-1291
...Affirmed. See Cacciatore v. State, 186 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Rhome v. State, 222 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Boykin v. State, 309 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). ...