Boykin v. Town of River Junction
Decision Date | 12 December 1935 |
Citation | 121 Fla. 902,164 So. 558 |
Parties | BOYKIN v. TOWN OF RIVER JUNCTION. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Suit by E. H. Boykin against the Town of River Junction. Decree for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded, with directions. Appeal from Circuit Court, Gadsden County; E. C. Love, Judge.
E. H Boykin, in pro. per.
Hugh M Taylor and Balke & Taylor, all of Quincy, for appellee.
The town of River Junction is a municipal corporation created and existing under and by virtue of chapter 9060 Special Acts 1921, Laws on Florida, and exercises all of the powers vested in municipalities under the general laws of Florida, as well as the special powers conferred upon it by its special charter and amendments thereto. [1]
Purporting to act under and by virtue of the terms and provisions of chapter 17118, Acts of 1935, General Laws of Florida, the said town of River Junction proposes to issue and sell 'mortgage revenue certificates' as described and provided to be issued by the municipality in accordance with the following resolution:
'Whereas the Water Supply System and Sewerage System are so closely related that the two should be combined and operated as one combined system;
'Now therefore be it resolved by the town council of the town of River Junction:
'Passed in open Council this 5th day of November, A.D. 1935.
'W. L. Sheppard
'Chairman Town Council Town of River Junction
'[Seal]
'Attest: R. H. Hatcher
'Town Clerk Town of River Junction.'
The present appeal is from a decree of the circuit court of Gadsden county denying an injunction and dismissing a bill of complaint filed by appellant as a citizen and taxpayer of the municipality, attacking the defendant municipality's above-outlined proposal as violative, among other things, of amended section 6 of article 9 of the State Constitution, which section prohibits the issuance of municipal bonds, unless the same shall first be approved by a majority of the votes cast in an election in which a majority of the freeholders who are qualified electors residing in the municipality shall participate; said election to be held in the manner prescribed by law therefor. See Senate Joint Resolution No. 26 (Acts 1929), ratified as part of the State Constitution in November, 1930.
In disposing of this appeal, we limit our consideration to the single proposition: 'Is the projected issuance of mortgage revenue certificates by a municipality, without an authorizing election held in accordance with amended section 6 of article 9 of the State Constitution in violation of said amended section and article, when the utility to be constructed with the proceeds of the contemplated certificates, together with an existing utility of a similar kind, are proposed to be combined, and their joint revenues and the physical properties of the combined...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. City of Tampa
...and is therefore void as an indirect scheme designed to strike down an intended constitutional safeguard against municipal profligacy.' 164 So. page 561. exception to the rule is the doctrine set out in State v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6, where it was held that if the city owne......
-
State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
...See also Patterson, supra, at 317. In contrast to the early State v. City of Miami, supra, was the case of Boykin v. Town of River Junction, 121 Fla. 902, 164 So. 558 (1935). There the Court disapproved the issuance of "revenue certificates" proposed for the purpose of financing the expansi......
-
State v. City of De Land
... ... City of Daytona Beach, 121 Fla ... 212, 163 So. 565, 566; Boykin v. Town of River ... Junction, 121 Fla. 902, 164 So. 558; Leon County v ... ...
-
Sheldon v. Grand River Dam Auth., Case Number: 28318
...fails, and resort to taxation to save a valuable investment. The authority cited in support of this proposition is Boykin v. Town of River Junction (1935, Fla.) 164 So. 558, and Kathleen Citrus Land Co. v. City of Lakeland (1936, Fla.) 169 So. 356. Those cases involved the extension and enl......