Bradbury v. Bedbury
Decision Date | 05 October 1883 |
Citation | 16 N.W. 854,31 Minn. 163 |
Parties | James B. Bradbury v. Charles Bedbury |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
This action was brought in the district court for Lyon county, to recover possession of a piano, and was tried by Baldwin, J., without a jury. Judgment was ordered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from an order by Webber, J., refusing a new trial.
Forbes & Seward, for appellant.
M. E. Mathews, for respondent.
By the Court. There is only a question of fact in this case, and the evidence would justify a finding of all the facts necessary to sustain the judgment. The facts found justify the judgment, and, if appellant desired a finding on other facts, or a more specific statement of the facts found, he should have asked the court below to make such finding or statement.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hewitt v. Blumenkranz
... ... to make it so, otherwise the objection is waived ... Smith v. Pendergast, 26 Minn. 318, 3 N.W ... 978; Bradford v. Bedbury, 31 Minn. 163, 16 ... N.W. 854; School-district v. Wrabeck, 31 ... Minn. 77, 16 N.W. 493 ... The ... evidence justified the ... ...
-
Cummings v. Rogers
... ... specific findings as are desired and deemed to be warranted ... by the evidence. Smith v. Pendergast, 26 ... Minn. 318, (3 N.W. 978;) Bradbury v ... Bedbury, 31 Minn. 163, (16 N.W. 854;) ... Hewitt v. Blumenkranz, 33 Minn. 417, (23 ... N.W. 858.) ... 2. Upon ... a ... ...