Bradbury v. Bedbury

Decision Date05 October 1883
Citation16 N.W. 854,31 Minn. 163
PartiesJames B. Bradbury v. Charles Bedbury
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

This action was brought in the district court for Lyon county, to recover possession of a piano, and was tried by Baldwin, J., without a jury. Judgment was ordered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from an order by Webber, J., refusing a new trial.

Forbes & Seward, for appellant.

M. E. Mathews, for respondent.

OPINION

By the Court. There is only a question of fact in this case, and the evidence would justify a finding of all the facts necessary to sustain the judgment. The facts found justify the judgment, and, if appellant desired a finding on other facts, or a more specific statement of the facts found, he should have asked the court below to make such finding or statement.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hewitt v. Blumenkranz
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1885
    ... ... to make it so, otherwise the objection is waived ... Smith v. Pendergast, 26 Minn. 318, 3 N.W ... 978; Bradford v. Bedbury, 31 Minn. 163, 16 ... N.W. 854; School-district v. Wrabeck, 31 ... Minn. 77, 16 N.W. 493 ...          The ... evidence justified the ... ...
  • Cummings v. Rogers
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1887
    ... ... specific findings as are desired and deemed to be warranted ... by the evidence. Smith v. Pendergast, 26 ... Minn. 318, (3 N.W. 978;) Bradbury v ... Bedbury, 31 Minn. 163, (16 N.W. 854;) ... Hewitt v. Blumenkranz, 33 Minn. 417, (23 ... N.W. 858.) ...          2. Upon ... a ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT