Bradford v. Eastman
| Citation | 229 Mass. 499,118 N.E. 879 |
| Parties | BRADFORD v. EASTMAN et al. |
| Decision Date | 28 February 1918 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Superior Court, Essex County.
Suit by Emeline Bradford against Lilla Eastman and others. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Decree ordered modified, and decree directed accordingly.
Samuel H. Hollis and Raymond T. Parke, both of Lynn, for appellants.
Henry R. Mayo, of Lynn, for appellee.
These are the facts, as found by the master. In December, 1914, Emeline Bradford, a widow 72 years of age, was planning to go to Nova Scotia to visit her sister, who was the defendant's mother. Her property consisted of three savings bank deposits, amounting to about $2,500. She caused the deposits to be put in the names of herself and the defendant, and delivered possession of the deposit books to the defendant on the latter's promise to return them whenever so requested. It is expressly found that:
‘The plaintiff's intention in delivering possession of the books to the defendant was to provide a convenient method, as she thought, of drawing on her bank accounts while out of the country, by having the defendant hold the books, draw sums and forward them to her as she required, and return the books to her when called for.’
She did not intend to make a gift of the books or of the money represented by them, and she would not have delivered the books to her niece but for the latter's promise to return them when requested.
Mrs. Bradford went to Nova Scotia in May, 1915, and remained there until January, 1916. She then returned to Lynn, and lived at the defendant's home for some months. On several occasions she demanded her bank books, but the defendant, in violation of her promise, refused to give them up. This suit was brought to get possession of them.
[2] The defendant did not testify as a witness. Her contention is that by reason of the deposit books being made out in the joint names of her aunt and herself, and of the terms of the identification cards prepared by the banks when they issued the books, she became joint owner of the money with the real owner. It may be assumed that, as between the banks and these parties, the banks would be justified in treating the deposits as funds in which the parties had a joint interest. But as between the plaintiff and defendant, the money belonged always and wholly to Mrs. Bradford, as the master has found. Whatever legal title Mrs. Eastman had in the books or money, she held in trust for her aunt. That trust in personal property could be established by parol, notwithstanding the form in which the books were made out. The defendant's possession of the bank books was merely that of an agent, under express obligation to return them to her principal on demand. Upon her refusal to so return them, and on the facts disclosed in the record, a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Blanchette v. Blanchette
...bank account are still alive we have frequently upheld allegations or findings that there was no donative intent. Bradford v. Eastman, 229 Mass. 499, 501, 118 N.E. 879; Moreau v. Moreau, 250 Mass. 110, 113, 145 N.E. 43; R. H. White Co. v. Lees, 267 Mass. 112, 115, 166 N.E. 705; Bedirian v. ......
-
Matthew v. Moncrief
..."bald averment" that the joint account agreement did not express the true intention of the donor. 2 In one instance, Bradford v. Eastman, 1918, 229 Mass. 499, 118 N.E. 879, the validity of the instrument was successfully challenged by the donor in his lifetime, but the court did not rely up......
-
Gibbons v. Gibbons
...bank accounts as trustee for him. See Koutoudakis v. Great American Indemnity Co., 285 Mass. 466, 469, 189 N.E. 621. In Bradford v. Eastman, 229 Mass. 499,118 N.E. 379, original owner of a savings bank deposit obtained a decree for the redelivery to her of the bank books, although she had t......
-
Berry v. Kyes
...... some other ground she never acquired an interest therein. The. case is clearly distinguishable from Bradford v. Eastman, 229 Mass. 499 , Battles v. Millbury Savings. Bank, 250 Mass. 180 , Lukey v. Parks, 279 Mass. 244 , Moreau v. Moreau, 250 Mass. 110 , ......