Bradley v. Creath
| Decision Date | 31 October 1858 |
| Citation | 27 Mo. 415 |
| Parties | BRADLEY, Defendant in Error, v. CREATH, Plaintiff in Error. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. The Supreme Court will not review instructions, unless they are excepted to at the time they are given or refused.
Error to Marion Circuit Court.
T. C. Reynolds and Pratt & McCabe, for plaintiff in error.
Dryden, for defendant in error.
The only error complained of in this case is that the court refused to give an instruction asked by the plaintiff, and though it was made the ground of a motion for a new trial, it does not appear that an exception was taken at the time. It is the practice of this court not to review instructions unless they were excepted to at the time they were given or refused. (Powers v. Allen, 14 Mo. 367.)
The other judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Case v. Fogg
...at the close of his bill defendant says: “To all of which defendant excepts.” This is insufficient. (33 Mo. 149; 34 Mo. 141; 21 Mo. 122; 27 Mo. 415; 31 Mo. 530; 13 Mo. 511; 14 Mo. 367; Duffield v. Cross, 13 Ill. 699; Johnson v. Bell, 10 Ind. 363; Andres v. Broughton, 21 Ala. 200; Sammins v.......
-
Ewing v. Reilly
...(Bompart v. Rodgers, 8 Mo. 234; Randolph v. Alsey, 8 Mo. 656; Mattingly v. Moranville, 11 Mo. 604; Powers v. Allen, 14 Mo. 367; Bradley v. Creath, 27 Mo. 415; Dozier v. Jerman, 30 Mo. 216; Devlin v. Clark, 31 Mo. 22.) The record shows no exceptions taken to the giving or refusing of instruc......
- Griffith v. Schwenderman