Bradshaw v. CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DIST.

Decision Date11 September 2003
Citation98 P.3d 886
Docket Number02CA0940
PartiesDonna T. BRADSHAW and Ken Bradshaw, personally and as parents and next friends of Mia Bradshaw; and Mia Bradshaw, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, and the Board of Education of Cherry Creek School District No. 5, in its official capacity, a Colorado municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Macaulay v. Villegas
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 7, 2022
    ...Nichols v. DeStefano , 70 P.3d 505, 507 (Colo. App. 2002), aff'd , 84 P.3d 496 (Colo. 2004) ; see also Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5 , 98 P.3d 886, 890 (Colo. App. 2003) (rejecting claim of due process violation for allegedly failing to provide time to respond to evidence at hea......
  • Cericalo v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 7, 2005
    ...discrimination against individuals with disabilities by public entities in providing public services. See Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5, 98 P.3d 886 (Colo.App.2003). Specifically, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132, a qualified individual with a disability cannot, "by reason of such ......
  • Kenna v. Huber
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • June 14, 2007
    ...the legislative intent. Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C., 3 P.3d 30, 35 (Colo.2000); Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5, 98 P.3d 886, 889 (Colo.App. 2003). Generally, we give deference to the interpretation of a statute by the charged with its enforcement. However......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT