Bradshaw v. CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DIST.
Decision Date | 11 September 2003 |
Citation | 98 P.3d 886 |
Docket Number | 02CA0940 |
Parties | Donna T. BRADSHAW and Ken Bradshaw, personally and as parents and next friends of Mia Bradshaw; and Mia Bradshaw, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, and the Board of Education of Cherry Creek School District No. 5, in its official capacity, a Colorado municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Macaulay v. Villegas
...Nichols v. DeStefano , 70 P.3d 505, 507 (Colo. App. 2002), aff'd , 84 P.3d 496 (Colo. 2004) ; see also Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5 , 98 P.3d 886, 890 (Colo. App. 2003) (rejecting claim of due process violation for allegedly failing to provide time to respond to evidence at hea......
-
Cericalo v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
...discrimination against individuals with disabilities by public entities in providing public services. See Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5, 98 P.3d 886 (Colo.App.2003). Specifically, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132, a qualified individual with a disability cannot, "by reason of such ......
-
Kenna v. Huber
...the legislative intent. Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C., 3 P.3d 30, 35 (Colo.2000); Bradshaw v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. No. 5, 98 P.3d 886, 889 (Colo.App. 2003). Generally, we give deference to the interpretation of a statute by the charged with its enforcement. However......