Bradstreet v. Bradstreet
Decision Date | 13 November 1928 |
Docket Number | Civil 2778 |
Citation | 271 P. 717,34 Ariz. 340 |
Parties | HERBERT N. BRADSTREET, Appellant v. BONNY DOONE BRADSTREET, Appellee |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. J. E. Jones, Judge. Judgment affirmed.
Messrs Baxter & Carpenter, for Appellant.
Messrs Hayes, Stanford, Walton, Allee & Williams, for Appellee.
Bonny Doone Bradstreet, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit for divorce against Herbert N. Bradstreet, her husband hereinafter called defendant, in the superior court of Maricopa county. The matter was heard and a divorce granted the decree providing that the custody of the two minor children of defendant and plaintiff should be alternated between the parties, each to have the children for one year at a time. Plaintiff removed to the state of California, and there married a man by the name of Bryan, defendant remaining in Arizona, and also remarrying. In June, 1927, plaintiff, who had previously had the children with her, brought them to Arizona and delivered them to their father in compliance with the decree. They remained with him until a few days before the time when according to the decree, they were to be returned to their mother, when defendant filed a petition asking that the decree be modified, to allow them to remain permanently with him. At this time the elder of the two children, Bonnie Doone, was thirteen years of age, and the younger Anne, was about eleven.
The trial court set the matter for hearing, and ordered that defendant furnish bond in the sum of five hundred dollars to cover the costs and counsel fees of plaintiff, in case she should prevail at the hearing, which bond was duly given. The matter was not heard by the judge who made the original order, but by one from an outside county. Evidence was presented on behalf of both plaintiff and defendant, it being the effort of defendant to show that the children's physical, moral and spiritual welfare would not be so well served by their being sent back to California to plaintiff, and plaintiff contending, on the other hand, that they were properly cared for by her, and that the original decree should stand. The court, after hearing the testimony, made the following findings of fact.
-- and refused to modify the decree in regard to the custody of the children, from which refusal defendant has appealed to this court.
There are some six assignments of error, which raise in effect but two legal questions: First, was the court's refusal to modify the decree an abuse of its discretion? Second, had it jurisdiction under the circumstances to award costs to the plaintiff? We consider these questions in their order. Paragraphs 3867, 3870, 3871, and 3872, Revised Statutes of Arizona of 1913, Civil Code, referring to the subject of divorce, read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ward v. Ward
...abused its discretion. Gottelf v. Gotthelf, 38 Ariz. 369, 300 P. 186; McFadden v. McFadden, 22 Ariz. 246, 196 P. 452; Bradstreet v. Bradstreet, 34 Ariz. 340, 271 P. 717. However, it should be noted that, in the order appealed from in the instant case, the trial court did not determine that ......
-
Catlow, Matter of
...(1931) (court has power to award attorney's fee in child custody proceeding held nine months after divorce); Bradstreet v. Bradstreet, 34 Ariz. 340, 346-47, 271 P. 717, 719 (1928) (statutory fee awarded in child custody proceeding held subsequent to divorce action); Smith v. Smith, 117 Ariz......
-
Nesbitt v. Nesbitt
...require that the husband pay the expenses thereof, provided the discretion is exercised in a reasonable manner. Bradstreet v. Bradstreet, 34 Ariz. 340, 347, 271 P. 717 (1928); Fleming v. Fleming, 58 Nev. 179, 72 P.2d 1110, 1113 Statutory provisions such as ours allowing attorney's fees to a......
-
Smith v. Smith, 6876
... ... Galbraith v. Galbraith, supra; Ward v. Ward, supra; Bradstreet v. Bradstreet, 34 Ariz. 340, 271 ... P. 717; McFadden v. McFadden, 22 Ariz. 246, 196 P. 452 ... Appellant is a member of a ... ...