Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc.

Decision Date03 April 2007
Docket NumberNo. 85 SSM 5.,85 SSM 5.
Citation8 N.Y.3d 931,866 N.E.2d 448
PartiesLottie BRANHAM, Appellant, v. LOEWS ORPHEUM CINEMAS, INC., Respondent, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
MEMORANDUM.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed with costs and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must on defendant's motion for summary judgment (see Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Mgt., L.P., 7 N.Y.3d 96, 817 N.Y.S.2d 606, 850 N.E.2d 653 (2006)), defendant Loews demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. In opposition, plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence that Loews had actual or constructive notice of the transient obstruction — a boy sitting in the aisle — or that the lighting in the theater was inadequate (see Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967, 622 N.Y.S.2d 493, 646 N.E.2d 795 (1994); Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774 (1986); see also Gilson v. Metropolitan Opera, 5 N.Y.3d 574, 807 N.Y.S.2d 588, 841 N.E.2d 747 (2005)).

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
173 cases
  • DeEscobar v. Westland S. Shore Mall, L.P.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2018
    ... ... Ryder Truck, Inc., 91 A.D.3d 935, 937 N.Y.S.2d 602 [2d ... Dept 2012]; ... (see Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 ... N.Y.3d 931, 834 ... ...
  • Miloscia v. B.R. Guest Holdings Llc
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 15, 2011
    ...judgment, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party ( see Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 931, 932, 834 N.Y.S.2d 503, 866 N.E.2d 448 [2007] ), and the motion must be denied if there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue of fa......
  • Guntlow v. Barbera
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 19, 2010
    ...an order granting defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see e.g. Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 931, 932, 834 N.Y.S.2d 503, 866 N.E.2d 448 [2007]; Crosland v. New York City Tr. Auth., 68 N.Y.2d 165, 168 n. 2, 506 N.Y.S.2d 670, 498 N.E.2d 143 [......
  • Cuomo v. Greenberg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 8, 2012
    ...for summary judgment is construed in the light most favorable to the opponent of the motion ( Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 931, 834 N.Y.S.2d 503, 866 N.E.2d 448 [2007] ). Further, in opposition to such motion for summary judgment, a court can consider hearsay evidence ( ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT