Brannen/Goddard Co. v. PNC REALTY HOLDING

Decision Date02 June 1999
Docket NumberNo. A99A0045.,A99A0045.
Citation519 S.E.2d 35,238 Ga. App. 387
PartiesBRANNEN/GODDARD COMPANY et al. v. PNC REALTY HOLDING CORPORATION OF GEORGIA.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Harman, Owen, Saunders & Sweeney, Perry A. Phillips, Atlanta, for appellants.

Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, J. Marbury Rainer, Charles W. Lyons, Atlanta, for appellee.

ANDREWS, Judge.

Brannen/Goddard Company (B/G) and King Industrial Realty, Inc. (King), real estate brokers, sued PNC Realty Holding Corporation of Georgia (PNC) and Nolan Road West, Ltd. (Nolan) alleging that either PNC or Nolan owes them real estate commissions for procuring a tenant which leased commercial property owned first by Nolan then transferred by Nolan to PNC. After the property was leased, Nolan entered into a commission agreement with B/G and King, but claimed that PNC assumed the obligation to pay commissions due under the agreement when the property was transferred to PNC and the lease was assigned to PNC pursuant to a lease assignment agreement. PNC moved for summary judgment claiming that nothing in the lease assignment showed that it agreed to assume Nolan's obligation to pay commissions to B/G and King. The trial court granted summary judgment to PNC, and B/G and King appeal.

The 1987 commission agreement recognized that B/G and King procured a tenant which leased commercial property owned by Nolan and provided that, as compensation for this service, Nolan would pay commissions to B/G and King during the term of the lease, during any extension or renewal of the lease, or during any new lease of the property to the same tenant. In January 1992, Nolan and the tenant entered into a new lease of the property. The new lease provided in part that "[Nolan] hereby agrees to pay any broker's commissions due to [B/G] and [King]."

After defaulting on loan obligations to PNC Bank Corporation, Nolan transferred the leased property to PNC in September 1992 to settle those obligations. As part of the settlement, Nolan and PNC entered into a lease assignment agreement in September 1992 which provided in part that:

[Nolan assigns to PNC] all of its right, title and interest in and to ... (i) all leases, subleases, licenses, rental contracts and other agreements (collectively the "Leases") relating to the occupancy now existing or hereafter entered into and affecting [the leased property]; and (ii) all rents, issues, profits, income and proceeds to become due from tenants of the Property from and after the Effective Date....
[PNC], by its acceptance hereof, does hereby assume and agree to perform the obligations and liabilities of [Nolan] as of the aforesaid Effective Date; provided, however, that [PNC] does not assume and perform any obligation or liability under any of the Leases relating to or rising out of events or occurrences on or before such date.

The settlement agreement between Nolan and PNC provided that the effective date referred to in the lease assignment was a date no later than September 14, 1992.

In moving for summary judgment, PNC contended that the 1987 commission agreement between Nolan and B/G and King created an obligation on the part of Nolan to pay the commissions, and that PNC was not a party to that agreement nor did it assume Nolan's obligation under the agreement when the lease was assigned to PNC in the September 1992 lease assignment agreement. In responding to the motion for summary judgment, B/G and King contended that a question of fact was presented as to whether, under the lease assignment, PNC assumed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Baker v. Brannen/Goddard Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 4 Febrero 2002
    ...moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted PNC's motion, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Brannen/Goddard Co. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp., 238 Ga.App. 387, 519 S.E.2d 35 (1999). Accordingly, the original action proceeded against Nolan. For purposes of this appeal, that proceeding......
  • Corsini v. State
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 2 Junio 1999
  • Nolan Road West v. PNC REALTY HOLDING
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 29 Enero 2001
    ...After the trial Court granted the motion, this Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment to PNC in Brannen/Goddard Co. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp., 238 Ga.App. 387, 519 S.E.2d 35 (1999), because we found "no ambiguity in the lease assignment agreement with respect to whether PNC assumed ......
  • Dunn v. Royal Maccabees Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 20 Marzo 2000
    ...& Haas Co. v. Gainesville Paint &c. Co., 225 Ga. App. 441, 443-444(2)(b), 483 S.E.2d 888. See also Brannen/Goddard Co. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp., 238 Ga.App. 387, 389, 519 S.E.2d 35. 2. Borders v. Global Ins. Co., 208 Ga.App. 480, 482-483(2), 430 S.E.2d 3. Paragraph 10 of the application ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Commercial Law - Robert A. Weber Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 52-1, September 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...s.e.2d 413 (1999). 165. Id. at 57, 518 s.e.2d at 414. 166. Id. at 59, 518 s.e.2d at 415. 167. Id. at 59 n.8, 518 s.e.2d at 415 n.8. 168. 238 Ga. App. 387, 519 S.E.2d 35 (1999). 169. Id. at 387-88, 519 S.E.2d at 35-36. 170. Id. at 390, 519 S.E.2d at 37. 171. Id. at 389, 519 S.E.2d at 36. 172......
  • § 29A.04 The Calculation of Commission
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Negotiating and Drafting Commercial Leases CHAPTER 29A Lease Brokerage
    • Invalid date
    ...Inc. v. Wein, 271 A.D.2d 344, 707 N.Y.S.2d 76 (2000).[15] Id.[16] Id. [17] Brannen/Goddard Co. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp. of Georgia, 238 Ga. App. 387, 519 S.E.2d 35 (1999), reconsideration denied Nolan Rd. West Ltd. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp., 248 Ga. App. 248 (2001). Accord, Longley-Jon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT