Brawley v. State, 4D00-2420.
| Decision Date | 15 May 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 4D00-2420.,4D00-2420. |
| Citation | 815 So.2d 789 |
| Parties | Christopher BRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Raag Singhal of Law Offices of Kaplan & Singhal, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
We affirm on all issues raised. As to the specific issues concerning the factual basis for appellant's plea and the constitutionality of section 775.051, Florida Statutes, appellant failed to preserve these issues for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant did not reserve the right to appeal any prior dispositive trial court orders when entering his no contest plea, nor did he subsequently move to withdraw his plea.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
FLORIDA FIRST FINANCIAL GROUP v. De Castro
... ... objected to correspondence as to other debtors, alleging that it would violate federal and state consumer protection acts. On the same grounds it objected to producing its long distance telephone ... ...