Breiding v. Giladi, 2004-01778.
| Decision Date | 14 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | 2004-01778. |
| Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 01155,789 N.Y.S.2d 449,15 A.D.3d 435 |
| Parties | ELISA E. BREIDING et al., Appellants, v. DAVID GILADI et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The Supreme Court's order, which was issued before the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Brill v City of New York (2 NY3d 648 [2004]), erroneously granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The motion was made more than two months after the statutory deadline (i.e., 120 days from the date the note of issue was filed) (see CPLR 3212 [a]), and the defendants' perfunctory claims of unspecified clerical inadvertence and reassignment of counsel were insufficient to constitute good cause for the delay (see Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 NY3d 725 [2004]; Brill v City of New York, supra; Sanango v Generoso, 13 AD3d 349 [2004]; Gibbs v McRide Cab Co., 10 AD3d 671 [2004]; Thompson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 10 AD3d 650 [2004]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Castillo v. 281 Broadway Assocs., 12984/09.
...New York, 2 N.Y.3d 648, 652 [2004] ; Pierre v. Feldman, 41 A.D.3d 454, 455, 836 N.Y.S.2d 702 [2nd Dept 2007] ; Breiding v. Giladi, 15 A.D.3d 435, 789 N.Y.S.2d 449 [2nd Dept 2005] ).A motion is "made" when the notice of motion is served ( Steisel v. Golden Reef Diner, 67 A.D.3d 670, 670, 888......
-
Deans v. Nassau Cnty. Pub. Adm'r
...Dept 2005] citing Gibbs v. McRide Cab Co., 10 A.D.3d 671 [2d Dept. 2004]; Thompson v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 10 A.D.3d at 651. In Breiding v. Giladi, the defendant movant claimed office failure as good cause for delay. See Breiding v. Giladi, 15 A.D.3d 435 [2d Dept. 2005]. The Court he......
-
Sharpe v. Shabbat LLC
...A.D.3d 681, 682 [2d Dept 2005] [no good cause shown where the defendant attributed the delay to "its large caseload"]; Breiding v Giladi, 15 A.D.3d 435, 435 [2d Dept 2005] [concluding that "perfunctory claims of unspecified clerical inadvertence and reassignment of counsel were insufficient......
-
Maschi v. City of N.Y.
...LLC, 71 A.D.3d 445, 448, 897 N.Y.S.2d 46;Azcona v. Salem, 49 A.D.3d 343, 852 N.Y.S.2d 767 [1st Dept.2008]; Breiding v. Giladi, 15 A.D.3d 435, 789 N.Y.S.2d 449 [2d Dept.2005] ). Also unavailing is defendant's contention that plaintiff's failure to furnish it with the estate's tax return excu......