Brennan v. Brennan
Decision Date | 13 July 1955 |
Docket Number | No. 34146,34146 |
Citation | 164 Ohio St. 29,50 A.L.R.2d 1259,128 N.E.2d 89 |
Parties | , 50 A.L.R.2d 1259, 57 O.O. 71 BRENNAN, Appellee, v. BRENNAN, Appellant. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. It is the policy of the law to favor and encourage arbitration, and every reasonable intendment will be indulged to give effect to such proceedings and to favor the regularity and integrity of the arbitrator's acts.
2. Where a matter is submitted to an arbitrator for decision, with an agreement that the arbitrator's decision shall be binding upon all the persons involved, such persons are bound by such decision provided there is no fraud or bad faith on the part of the arbitrator and he acts according to the instructions given him.
Ralph E. Brennan, appellee herein, hereinafter designated plaintiff, and Arthur D. Brennan, appellant herein, hereinafter designated defendant, are brothers.
For many years plaintiff and defendant were associated together in The Brennan Company, which is engaged in the printing business in Akron. That company had 120 shares of issued and outstanding stock, of which plaintiff owned 40 shares, defendant 40 shares, and their mother 40 shares.
Since the death of plaintiff's and defendant's father about 1921 or 1922, plaintiff had been president and general manager, and defendant secretary-treasurer, although the evidence shows that defendant was in the selling end of the business and had little to do with the books, which were predominantly under the supervision of plaintiff.
Differences having arisen between the brothers, they finally decided that plaintiff would sell his 40 shares of stock to defendant. They agreed to have a contract of sale drawn by Robert Guinther, and Akron lawyer.
On January 26, 1945, the two brothers met with Guinther for the purpose of entering into a written contract of sale, and the three of them discussed that terms of the contract, plaintiff doing most of the talking for the brothers.
After the discussion, Guinther called in a stenographer and dictated the form of a contract within the hearing of the brothers. After the stenographer had reduced the dictation to writing, a copy of the contract was given to each of the brothers, and they signed the same. No question is made that the contract they signed was freely and fully entered into by each of them.
The contract reads as follows:
'Agreement.
'Ralph E. Brennan, of Akron, Ohio, hereinafter called the 'seller' and A. D. Brennan, also of Akron, Ohio, hereinafter called the 'buyer,' agree with each other as follows:
'In witness whereof, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands at Akron, Ohio, this 26th day of January, 1945.
'R. E. Brennan
'Arthur D. Brennan
'I acknowledge that I have received the certificate of stock and the resignation described foregoing and that I will hold the same pursuant to the terms thereof.
'Robert Guinther.'
In pursuance of the contract, defendant delivered to plaintiff his check for $2,000, which plaintiff cashed, and plaintiff delivered to Guinther his endorsed stock certificate for 40 shares of stock, and thereafter the certified public accountants named in the contract proceeded to ascertain the book value of each share of stock of the company as of February 1, 1945.
On March 7, 1945, the accountants furnished a report to plaintiff and defendant on the examination of the books of the company as of January 31, 1945, including statements of financial condition and surplus reconciliation.
The accountants found the book value of the stock to be $238.19 per share, and asserted that such value was determined in accordance with the instructions in the agreement.
When defendant received his copy of the accountants' report, he turned over to Guinther a check in the sum of $9,090.10, which covered the balance due on plaintiff's stock at the rate of $238.19 per share, as well as the balance due on plaintiff's salary to March 1, 1945.
At the time, plaintiff was in ill health in Arizona, so that he did not receive this last check until some time in May 1945, at which time he cashed it, and then on October 11, 1945, he instituted an action against defendant, alleging in his petition that he entered into a written contract with defendant for the sale of his stock to defendant (a copy of the contract being attached to the petition); that plaintiff did all things to be performed by him under the contract but defendant paid to him only a portion of the purchase price of the stock agreed upon; and that there is due plaintiff from defendant $2,369.55, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from March 16, 1945, which sum is the balance of the book value of the stock, as agreed to by the parties, unpaid by defendant by reason of the fact that defendant, in the amount which he paid plaintiff for the book value of the stock, omitted an item of valuation for machinery and equipment in the sum of $6,271.27 and an item of office equipment in the sum of $837.38, or a total of $7,108.65.
Plaintiff prays judgment against defendant for the sum of $2,369.55, with interest at six per cent per annum from March 16, 1945.
Defendant filed an answer admitting that plaintiff did all things to be done by him under the contract, but denying all other allegations in the petition.
Defendant alleges further that the contract was fully performed by both parties thereto; that defendant paid to plaintiff the book value of the shares of stock of The Brennan Company as determined by the public accountants designated by the parties for such purposes, and whose determinations were by agreement final and conclusive upon both parties; and that there has been complete accord and satisfaction between the parties.
Plaintiff filed a reply denying all allegations contained in defendant's answer, except such as are admissions of allegations in plaintiff's petition, and alleging that the contract of sale required the public accountants to make an examination of the books of The Brennan Company, to prepare a statement showing the book value of the property and assets and the book value of the shares of stock of the company, and, in doing so, to employ the ordinary and usual methods of accounting applicable to the preparation of such statements; that such accountants did not do the same but arbitrarily employed extraordinary and unusual methods in the preparation of such statement, contrary to the terms of such contract; that such statement did not show the true book value or true depreciated values of machinery, equipment and office equipment, as shown by the books of the company, but fixed them at a lower figure than, and contrary to, that shown by the books; that such statement showed and fixed the book value of the company at an amount less than that shown by the books of the company; and that such statement was not made in accordance...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Company
...86 A. 881; Stowe v. Mutual Home Builders Corp., 252 Mich. 492, 233 N.W. 391; Tabor v. Craft, 217 Ala. 276, 116 So. 132; Brennan v. Brennan, 164 Ohio St. 29, 128 N.E.2d 89. . . . . . "Plaintiff's authorities do not suggest any principle of law different from the principles set forth in the a......
-
Stepp v. Ncr Corp.
...v. Kelm, 73 Ohio App.3d 395, 597 N.E.2d 535, 539 (1992). While arbitration awards were enforceable, see, e.g., Brennan v. Brennan, 164 Ohio St. 29, 128 N.E.2d 89, 94 (1955) (noting that binding arbitration awards were held enforceable in Ohio, except where obtained by fraud or the like, at ......
-
Raasch v. Ncr Corp., C-3-02-272.
...v. Kelm, 73 Ohio App.3d 395, 597 N.E.2d 535, 539 (1992). While arbitration awards were enforceable, see, e.g., Brennan v. Brennan, 164 Ohio St. 29, 128 N.E.2d 89, 94 (1955) (noting that binding arbitration awards were held enforceable in Ohio, except where obtained by fraud or the like, at ......
-
New Hope Cmty. Church v. Patriot Energy Partners, LLC
...over many years. Schaefer v. Allstate Ins. Co., 63 Ohio St.3d 708, 711–712, 590 N.E.2d 1242 (1992), citing e.g., Brennan v. Brennan, 164 Ohio St. 29, 128 N.E.2d 89 (1955), paragraph one of the syllabus; Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Mahoning Cty. TMR Edn. Assn. (1986), 22 Ohio ......