Brennan v. Freight Room, Inc.
Decision Date | 22 May 1997 |
Docket Number | No. A97A0418,A97A0418 |
Citation | 226 Ga.App. 531,487 S.E.2d 109 |
Parties | , 97 FCDR 2059 BRENNAN v. The FREIGHT ROOM, INC. et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Alan B. Gordon, Atlanta, for appellant.
Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, Wayne D. McGrew III, John W. Sandifer, Atlanta, for appellees.
Samuel T. Hibbitts, pro se.
Appellant brought this action to recover for injuries sustained in a fall at a public restaurant known as The Freight Room. She appeals the trial court's grant of a motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, who operated the restaurant.
Bates v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co., 223 Ga.App. 11, 12, 476 S.E.2d 797 (1996).
Viewed from this perspective, the evidence is that at approximately 8:30 p.m. on August 4, 1993, appellant and her son went to the restaurant. Appellant, who had not been there before, entered through the main entrance on the east side of the building. She remained inside until approximately 9:15 p.m., when she and her son went to the parking lot to retrieve an item from her car. The parking lot was poorly illuminated, the terrain was rough, and there was broken asphalt. She and her son exited the restaurant through the main entrance, proceeded to her car in the parking lot, and at the son's request went to a game room on the north side of the restaurant.
An elevated concrete walkway or porch is attached to the north side of the building. A set of stairs attached to the front of the walkway leads across the walkway to the door of the game room. There is also a set of two steps on the east side of the walkway. The first of these two steps is composed of broken concrete, and the second consists of brick and mortar; both are uneven. These two steps lead to an uneven gravel and dirt area on the ground. Several feet beyond the steps is a curb followed by a drop in elevation.
Appellant ascended the front stairs of the walkway and looked into the game room. She then descended the walkway by walking down the two side steps onto the ground. She testified that this was the most direct route to the main entrance, and the designated pedestrian walkway directly alongside the building appeared to be a safer route than going back out into the rough and broken parking lot by way of the front stairs, even though the direct route was somewhat darker. She and other restaurant patrons testified that the ground below the two side steps appeared to be level and, because it was very dark and the area was poorly illuminated, the curb was not visible.
As appellant was walking down the steps, she was looking down and trying to be very careful because she could not see very well because of the conditions. She was unaware of the drop in elevation and fell as she stepped off the curb. When asked whether she was looking ahead at the time of her fall, she responded,
Appellant charges appellees with negligence in failing to properly maintain the walkway and provide adequate lighting for the walkways and approaches to its premises.
1. "Where an owner or occupier of land, by express or implied invitation, induces or leads another to come upon his premises for any lawful purpose, he is liable in damages to such persons for injuries caused by his failure to exercise ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe." OCGA § 51-3-1.
Appellees argue that a jury could not find they failed in this duty because there is no evidence that the outside lighting was inadequate. To the contrary, appellant's evidence is that, although some lighting existed, it did not adequately illuminate the approaches to the restaurant.
(Citation, punctuation and emphasis omitted). Emory Univ. v. Duncan, 182 Ga.App. 326, 328(2), 355 S.E.2d 446 (1987).
Appellees argue that there is no evidence that they had any knowledge of the allegedly inadequate lighting, in that no other falls had occurred in the area and there had been no complaints regarding the lighting, and that appellant had superior knowledge of any inadequacy in the lighting.
The fact that there had been no prior incidents or complaints concerning the lighting does not absolve appellees of liability. " ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pandya v. Marriott Hotel Servs., Inc.
...after it becomes apparent to [him] or in the exercise of ordinary care [he] should have learned of it.’ " Brennan v. Freight Room, Inc. , 226 Ga.App. 531, 487 S.E.2d 109, 111 (1997) (quoting Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Ligon , 246 Ga. 620, 272 S.E.2d 327, 330 (1980) ). The plaintiff is required......
-
Moore v. Teague, A02A1011.
...492 S.E.2d 343 (1997); Jet Food Stores v. Kicklighter, 226 Ga.App. 552, 553(1), 487 S.E.2d 120 (1997); Brennan v. The Freight Room, 226 Ga.App. 531, 533(1), 487 S.E.2d 109 (1997); Newell v. Great A & P Tea Co., 222 Ga.App. 884, 885(2), 476 S.E.2d 631 3. Whatley v. Nat. Svcs. Indus., supra; ......
-
Smith v. NT Nails, LLC.
...she had to leave to get back to work and it would be unreasonable to require her to stay home. Also, in Brennan v. Freight Room, Inc., 226 Ga.App. 531, 487 S.E.2d 109 (1997), we held that a restaurant patron who was injured in a fall while walking on a walkway as she was leaving the facilit......
-
Whatley v. National Services Industry, Inc.
...a hazard. Sykes, supra (nonworking light fixture prevented plaintiff from seeing sidewalk construction); Brennan v. The Freight Room, 226 Ga.App. 531, 487 S.E.2d 109 (1997) (poorly illuminated walkway prevented plaintiff from seeing curb and drop in elevation); Sacker v. Perry Realty Svcs.,......