Brennan v. Mead
| Decision Date | 04 May 1981 |
| Citation | 81 A.D.2d 821,438 N.Y.S.2d 821 |
| Parties | Lois M. BRENNAN et al., Respondents, v. Donald A. MEAD et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Anthony J. Caputo, P. C., White Plains (Joseph J. Buderwitz, Jr. and Alfred E. Page, Jr., White Plains, of counsel), for all appellants except Westchester Fire Ins. Co.
George S. Pickwick, New York City (Michael Majewski and Joseph D. Ahearn, New York City, of counsel), for appellant Westchester Fire Ins. Co.
John S. McBride, Monticello, for respondents.
Before MOLLEN, P. J., and MARGETT, O'CONNOR and WEINSTEIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover "excess liability" for the bad faith breach of an insurance contract, the appeals, as limited by the defendants' briefs, are from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 7, 1980, as denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the defendant insurer's cross complaint.
Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and cross motion granted.
Plaintiffs were injured in a June, 1970 automobile accident and brought suit against one Clarence Welch. They sought to hold Welch's employer, the County of Orange, vicariously liable on the ground Welch caused the accident while in the course of his employment. During an April, 1971 examination before trial Welch had testified to that effect, but during the trial in 1974, after initially stating that he no longer remembered, he changed his testimony to admit that he had not been engaged in employment at the time of the accident. The jury returned a verdict against him well in excess of his policy limit, and found no liability on the county's part. On retrial of the action pursuant to this court's remittitur (Brennan v. Felter, 48 A.D.2d 846, 369 N.Y.S.2d 175), the same result obtained. Welch thereafter pleaded guilty to a criminal charge of perjury.
Welch assigned any claims he had against his insurance company and its counsel to plaintiffs, who brought the instant action to recover the excess of the jury award over the policy limit. The complaint essentially asserted a failure by defendants to offer a settlement to the plaintiffs for the full amount of the policy prior to trial of the personal injury action, and negligent conduct of that trial by the insurer's attorneys on behalf of the insured.
Mere negligence does not support an excess liability action (Best...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
D'Arata v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
...352 N.Y.S.2d 919, 308 N.E.2d 439; S.T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New York, 32 N.Y.2d 300, 344 N.Y.S.2d 938, 298 N.E.2d 105; Brennan v. Mead, 81 A.D.2d 821, 438 N.Y.S.2d 821, affd 54 N.Y.2d 811, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 427 N.E.2d In determining whether collateral estoppel should be applied so as to b......
-
Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. v. Arzillo
...plea precludes relitigation in a subsequent civil action of all issues necessarily determined by the conviction (see Brennan v. Mead, 81 A.D.2d 821, 438 N.Y.S.2d 821, affd. 54 N.Y.2d 811, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 427 N.E.2d 949; Alexander v. City of Peekskill, 80 A.D.2d 626, 436 N.Y.S.2d 327; Matt......
-
Richard L. v. Armon
...of sexual abuse in the second degree (see, Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. v. Arzillo, 98 A.D.2d 495, 504, 472 N.Y.S.2d 97; Brennan v. Mead, 81 A.D.2d 821, 438 N.Y.S.2d 821, affd. 54 N.Y.2d 811, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 427 N.E.2d The only issues of fact which were necessarily decided by virtue of the pri......
-
DiBlasi v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co.
...Assur. Co., 28 A.D.2d 639, 640, 280 N.Y.S.2d 695), "mere negligence does not support an excess liability action" (Brennan v. Mead, 81 A.D.2d 821, 438 N.Y.S.2d 821, affd. 54 N.Y.2d 811, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 427 N.E.2d 949; see also, Brown v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 314 F.2d 675). Althou......