Breton v. Breton
| Decision Date | 02 March 1955 |
| Citation | 332 Mass. 317,125 N.E.2d 121 |
| Parties | Joan BRETON v. Leo A. BRETON. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Solomon Rosenberg, New Bedford, for libellant.
John D. Sheehan, Springfield, for libellee.
Before QUA, C. J., and LUMMUS, WILKINS, SPALDING and WILLIAMS, JJ.
On June 2, 1953, the wife, the libellant in a divorce case, filed a petition that the custody of Bruce George Breton, seven years old, the child of the parties, which a year earlier had been awarded to the husband and father, be given to her. On January 12, 1954, the wife's petition was dismissed, and she appealed. The judge filed a report of the material facts found by him, which showed that the parties separated on January 2, 1952, and that the husband had cared for the boy properly ever since.
The evidence, which is reported, was conflicting as to the condition and care of the boy in his father's house. The boy is small for his age, and rather frail. By G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 208, § 28, a divorce court may 'revise and alter' a decree for custody 'as the circumstances of the parents and the benefit of the children may required.' Ordinarily a change in custody will not be made unless there has been a change in circumstances since the original decree for custody. Hinds v. Hinds, 329 Mass. 190, 191, 107 N.E.2d 319; Oliver v. Oliver, 151 Mass. 349, 351, 24 N.E. 51. As was said in Grandell v. Short, 317 Mass. 605, 608, 59 N.E.2d 274, 276. 'The wisdom of changing the order for custody was one peculiarly within the province of the judge, who observed the witnesses, among whom were both parents.' His decision is entitled to weight, and will not be reversed unless plainly wrong. Jenkins v. Jenkins, 304 Mass. 248, 252, 23 N.E.2d 405; Durfee v. Durfee, 293 Mass. 472, 477, 200 N.E. 395.
Decree dismissing petition affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sutera v. Sutera
...of the parties since the preceding decree was entered'. Hinds v. Hinds, 329 Mass. 190, 191, 107 N.E.2d 319, 320; Breton v. Breton, 332 Mass. 317, 125 N.E.2d 121. The Special Term was not precluded by the full faith and credit clause of the Federal Constitution from modifying the custodial p......
-
Stevens v. Stevens
...opportunity which the judge had to observe and appraise both parents is particularly important in a case of this kind. Breton v. Breton, 332 Mass. 317, 318, 125 N.E.2d 121. It is necessary, of course, to scrutinize with care an order which moves a child from the security of an established h......
- Souza v. Souza
-
O'Brien v. O'Brien
...of the evidence does not indicate that he was plainly wrong. Grandell v. Short, 317 Mass. 605, 608, 59 N.E.2d 274; Breton v. Breton, 332 Mass. 317, 318, 125 N.E.2d 121; Butters v. Butters, 345 Mass. 772, 187 N.E.2d 816. Decree affirmed. 1 Mass.Adv.Sh. (1963) 236. ...