Brewer v. American and Foreign Ins. Co., 90CA1582
| Decision Date | 12 March 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90CA1582,90CA1582 |
| Parties | Byrl F. BREWER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN AND FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. . II |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Stan Walter, P.C., Stan Walter, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
Johnson, Oldham & Angell, P.C., Richard Lee Angell, Denver, for defendant-appellant.
Opinion by Judge NEY.
Defendant, American and Foreign Insurance Company, (insurer) appeals the portion of the trial court's judgment, entered on a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff, Byrl F. Brewer, noneconomic and exemplary damages based upon the insurer's bad faith. We affirm.
Asserting that the origin of plaintiff's mobile home fire was arson, the insurer denied plaintiff's claim for his losses in that fire. Plaintiff brought this action to enforce his insurance claim and also sought damages based on the insurer's bad faith in denying the claim. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff's favor on both theories, concluding that the origin of the fire was not arson and that the insurer acted in bad faith in denying the claim. Accordingly, the jury awarded damages for the loss caused by the fire and noneconomic and exemplary damages on the bad faith claim. The insurer does not appeal the award based on the insurance contract.
I.
The insurer first contends that the trial court erred in denying its motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the bad faith claim, arguing that there can be no bad faith claim if there is any colorable evidence supporting the denial of an insurance claim. We disagree.
It is proper to submit conflicting evidence to the trier of fact. Converse v. Zinke, 635 P.2d 882 (Colo.1981). Unless clearly erroneous and unsupported by the record, the findings of the jury must be accepted on review. Vigil v. Pine, 176 Colo. 384, 490 P.2d 934 (1971).
A verdict should be directed only when the overwhelming evidence indicates that a reasonable person could not arrive at a contrary verdict. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Langdon, 187 Colo. 425, 532 P.2d 337 (1975). Likewise, judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be entered only when no reasonable person could reach the same conclusion as the jury. Converse v. Zinke, supra.
Here, the record supports the verdict. Therefore, the motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict were properly denied.
We reject defendant's assertion, based on National Savings Life Insurance Co. v. Dutton, 419 So.2d 1357 (Ala.1982), that, since plaintiff could not, as a matter of law, have properly been awarded a directed verdict on the underlying arson claim, his bad faith claim must, as a matter of law, be denied. We conclude such an interpretation of the burden to assert a bad faith claim is contrary to Colorado law. The test for an insurer's duty for good faith and fair dealing with its insured is one of reasonableness under the circumstances. Surdyka v. DeWitt, 784 P.2d 819 (Colo.App.1989).
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Savio, 706 P.2d 1258 (Colo.1985), requires a plaintiff in a bad faith claim to prove both the insurer's unreasonable conduct and its knowledge that the conduct is unreasonable or a reckless disregard of the fact that the conduct is unreasonable.
An objective basis requiring proof of the standards of conduct in the insurance industry may be used to determine the company's reasonableness in denying a claim. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Savio, supra.
Here, evidence indicates that acceptable investigative procedure such as determination of the chronology of the fire, its origin, its cause, whether burn patterns were present, and, if burn patterns were found, an interpretation of the patterns by an experienced arson investigator, were not followed by the insurance company. Thus, the evidence supports the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Murphy v. Glenn
...Life Insurance Co., 876 P.2d 1242 (Colo.1994), and can only disturb a jury verdict if clearly erroneous. Brewer v. American & Foreign Insurance Co., 837 P.2d 236 (Colo.App.1992). It is within the jury's province alone to determine the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses,......
-
Cook v. JACKSON NAT. LIFE INS. CO., Civ. A. No. 93-K-739.
...and because the test for an insurer's duty of good faith is "one of reasonableness under the circumstances," Brewer v. American & Foreign Ins. Co., 837 P.2d 236, 238 (Colo.App.1992), issues of material fact remain as to the reasonableness of Jackson's denial and as to whether it acted in re......
-
Burgess v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., MID-CENTURY
...osteopath. Under these circumstances, the trial court properly submitted plaintiff's claims to the jury. See Brewer v. American & Foreign Insurance Co., 837 P.2d 236 (Colo.App.1992). II. Defendant also urges us to find reversible error based on the jury instructions. We decline to do The tr......
-
Wagner v. Hilkey
...Conversely, if there is competent evidence to support a jury verdict, it will not be disturbed on appeal. Brewer v. American & Foreign Insurance Co., 837 P.2d 236 (Colo.App.1992). A correct judgment will not be disturbed on review, even if our analysis differs from that of the trial court. ......
-
The Insurer's Unreasonable Failure to Defend: Enough to Prove Bad Faith?
...377 (Wis. 1978). The Colorado Court of Appeals has since distanced itself from this standard in Brewer v. American and Foreign Ins. Co., 837 P.2d 236, 238 (ColoApp. 1992). Column Ed.: William P. Godsman of Salmon, Godsman & Nicholson, P.C., Englewood---(303) 771--9900 This month's column wa......
-
May 2008 - Crossing the Separation of Powers Threshold: Legislative and Regulatory Control of Expert Testimony
...1972); People v. Hankin, 498 P.2d 1116, 1118 (Colo. 1972); White v. People, 486 P.2d 4, 6 (Colo. 1971); Brewer v. Am. & Foreign Ins. Co., 837 P.2d 236, 239 1992); People v. Tidwell, 706 P.2d 438, 439 (Colo.App. 1985); Stone v. Caroselli, 653 P.2d 754, 757 (Colo.App. 1982). 24. Huntoon v. TC......