Brewster v. Laclede Land & Improvement Co.

Decision Date31 December 1912
Citation152 S.W. 302,247 Mo. 223
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesBREWSTER v. LACLEDE LAND & IMPROVEMENT CO.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Reynolds County; J. J. Williams, Judge.

Action by Sam M. Brewster against the Laclede Land & Improvement Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

This is a suit to quiet title to real estate. The petition is in the ordinary form under section 650, R. S. 1899, now section 2535, alleging that plaintiff owns said land; that defendant claims an interest therein the nature of which is unknown to plaintiff, and praying the court to ascertain, determine, and quiet the title thereto. The answer admits the corporate existence of the defendant, and that it claims title to the lands aforesaid, and denies that the plaintiff is the owner thereof in fee simple as pleaded in the petition or otherwise and denies all allegations in the petition not admitted, and further pleads that the cause of action pleaded by the plaintiff accrued more than 10 years before the filing of the suit, and pleads the 10-year statute of limitation as a bar to the right of the plaintiff to recover. There was no reply filed, and the case was tried as though a reply had been filed. The plaintiff put in evidence a clear chain of title down to himself. The defendant put in evidence certain sheriff's deeds for taxes dated in 1884 and mesne conveyances thereunder to the defendant. It is claimed by the plaintiff and admitted by the defendant that the sheriff's deeds are void ab initio. There was no evidence offered as to the possession of the land. The court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, adjudging that he is the owner of the land in fee simple.

J. B. Daniel, of Centerville, for appellant. Arthur T. Brewster, of Poplar Bluff, for respondent.

ROY, C. (after stating the facts as above).

1. The trial of the cause without any reply being filed, and without any motion on the part of the defendant for a default against plaintiff for want of reply, was the same, in effect, as if a general denial had been filed to the answer. Stevens v. Fitzpatrick, 218 Mo. loc. cit. 720, 118 S. W. 51; Atterbury v. Hendricks, 127 Mo. App. loc....

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Baade v. Cramer
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1919
    ... ... Sutton, 91 ... Mo. 531; McNair v. Picotte, 33 Mo. 57; Land Co ... v. Zeitler, 182 Mo. 251; Adams v. Carpenter, ... 187 Mo. 613; ... v. McMurray, 258 Mo. 405, 167 S.W. 513; Brewster v ... Land Imp. Co., 247 Mo. 223, 152 S.W. 302; Bird v ... Fox, 193 ... ...
  • Stein v. Rainey
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 30, 1926
    ... ... 234; Stevens ... v. Fitzpatrick, 218 Mo. 708; Brewster v. Land ... Co., 247 Mo. 223; Shull v. Boyd, 251 Mo. 452; ... expiration of the time given him to plead. [Land & Improvement Co. v. Creason, 264 Mo. l. c. 457.] The section ... just referred to ... ...
  • Armor v. Frey
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1913
    ... ... later he bought the bulk of the land from the Moore children, ... taking deed from them under agreement with ... in the counties of Greene, Barton, Laclede, Barry and Newton, ... in the State of Missouri, the same being land ...           Brewster ... v. Land & Imp. Co., 247 Mo. 223, 152 S.W. 3021, so far ... as it ... ...
  • Baade v. Cramer
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1919
    ...that it was filed and constituted a general denial (McMurray v. McMurray, 258 Mo. loc. cit. 416, 167 S. W. 513; Brewster v. Land Imp. Co., 247 Mo. loc. cit. 226, 152 S. W. 302; Bird v. Fox [App.] 193 S. W. 941), does not militate against the correctness of the conclusion that the quantum of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT