Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte
| Decision Date | 14 April 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-2148,79-2148 |
| Citation | 397 So.2d 959 |
| Parties | BRICKELL BAY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Michael FORTE et al., Appellees/Cross Appellants. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Paul E. Gifford and Paul A. Louis, Miami, for appellant/cross appellee.
Hall & Hauser and Richard F. O'Brien, III and Andrew C. Hall, Miami, for appellees/cross appellants.
Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.
There is no merit whatever in the appellant, Brickell Bay Club Condominium Association, Inc.'s claims of error in the entry of judgment against it, after non-jury trial, in an action seeking rescission of two agreements between the association and the appellees. Consequently, we affirm as to the appeal.
By cross-appeal, 1 the appellees challenge the trial court's failure to award them reasonable attorney's fee and costs, notwithstanding a specific term of one of the pertinent contracts which stated
In connection with any litigation arising out of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
The trial court apparently made its determination because the action had been brought in good faith and on fairly debatable grounds. This ruling was erroneous. The agreement which has been quoted gave those of the appellees who were parties to it, since they prevailed in the litigation below, a clear and unequivocal right to the recovery of both attorney's fees and costs. 2 The courts have no discretion to decline to enforce such an undertaking, any more than any other contractual provision. Ritter's Hotel, Inc. v. Sidebothom, 142 Fla. 171, 194 So. 322 (1940); Kendall East Estates, Inc. v. Banks, 386 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Silver Blue Lake Apts., No. 3, Inc. v. Manson, 334 So.2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the cause is remanded for the sole purpose of determining the amounts of attorney's fees and costs to be awarded under the provision in question. 3
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
2 Absent the agreement, the court would have discretion to deny costs to either side in an equitable action like this. Wilhelm v. Adams, 102 Fla. 669, 136 So. 397 (1931); International Center of the Americas, Inc. v. Dade Fashions, Inc....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Burger King Corp. v. Mason
...for the payment of attorney's fees is binding and must be enforced by the trial court. See, e.g., Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte, 397 So.2d 959, 960 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.), petition for review denied, 408 So.2d 1092 (Fla.1981); Silver Blue Lake Apartments, No. 3, Inc. v. Man......
-
Am. Infoage, LLC v. Regions Bank
...provisions at issue. Under Florida law, contractual attorneys' fees provisions are strictly enforced, Brickell Bay Club Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte, 397 So. 2d 959, 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and strictly construed, Succar v. Safra Nat'l Bank of N.Y., 237 F. App'x 526, 528 (11th Cir. 2007).ANA......
-
Sybert v. Combs
...464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Dubov Realty, Inc. v. Kucharek, 433 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte, 397 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 408 So.2d 1092 (Fla.1981). Here, the note provided for the payment of attorney's fees in clear ......
-
Kassier v. Kipnis
...provision in the promissory note entitling the prevailing party to such fees in any suit on the note. See Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n v. Forte, 397 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 408 So.2d 1092 (Fla.1981); Sybert v. Combs, 555 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Erickson Enter., ......