O'Brien v. Home Ben. Soc.
Citation | 22 N.E. 954,117 N.Y. 310 |
Parties | O'BRIEN v. HOME BEN. SOC. |
Decision Date | 26 November 1889 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from supreme court, general term, third department.
This action was brough by the administrator of Peter O'Brien, deceased, to recover upon a certificate of membership issued to him upon his application by the defendant, as follows:
The application was taken from O'Brien by an agent of the defendant, and it contains the answers to various questions, some of which are as follows: The application also contained the following: ‘I further declare and agree that the statements and representations contained in the foregoing application and declaration, together with those made to the medical examiner, shall be the basis of the contract between me and the said society; that I hereby warrant the same to be full, complete, and true, whether written by my own hand or not; and that if the same, or any of them, are in any respect untrue, the certificate which may be issued hereon shall be null and void and of no effect, and all moneys which may have been paid on account of such insurance shall be forfeited to said society, and the said contract shall not become binding upon the society unless at the time of its delivery the applicant is in sound health and mind.’ O'Brien died on the 10th day of January, 1886, from the disease of rheumatism, which disease he had had for some years prior to his application, and he had been attended therefor by physicians, and the answers given to the questions above set out were untrue. The plaintiff made proofs of the death of O'Brien, and forwarded them to the defendant, and the defendant refused to make an assessment for the payment of his claim; alleging that it had been defrauded by the untrue answers given by O'Brien as to his health and the medical attendance upon him. Thereafter this action was commenced, and the plaintiff alleged in his complaint the membership of Peter O'Brien; his death; that the amount to which he was entitled under and in pursuance of the certificate was the sum of $2,000; that the defendant had neglected and refused to pay the same, or any part thereof; and he demanded judgment for $2,000, with interest. The defendant in its answer alleged, as a defense, among other things, the untrue answers of O'Brien contained in his application, and that they were false and fraudulent. The action was brought to trial, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment upon that verdict having been affirmed at the general term, the defendant appealed to this court.
Charles Blandy, for appellant.
E. Countryman, for respondent.
EARL, J., ( after stating the facts as above.)
The application for membership taken by the defendant's agent from O'Brien was signed by his mark. He did not read and was not able to read it, and it was not read to him, and there was evidence upon the trial that he gave correct answers to all the questions contained in the application, but that his answers were incorrectly written...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Farmer
... ... 229; ... 30 F. 902; 47 F. 869; 29 N.J.L. 486; 6 Wend. 103; Bacon, Ben. & Life Ins. § 266, et seq. The evidence is sufficient to ... support ... 359-360-360a, 360b, 360d; 17 Minn 153; 35 N.E. 193; Bacon, ... Ben. Soc. & Life Ins. § 276, 277; 40 Ill.App. 266; 36 P ... 113; 23 P. 869; 22 ... Hartin, as such agent, forwarded it to the defendant at its ... home office for approval, and the said Farmer, at the time ... said ... ...
-
Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Summers
...he can avoid it and recover the premiums paid. (Malhoit v. Ins. Co., 87 Me. 374; Ins. Co. v. Reed, 13 L. R. A. 352; O'Brien v. Home &c. Soc., 22 N.E. 954.) such an action may be maintained whenever the defendant has money belonging to the plaintiff which in equity and good conscience it oug......
-
McFarland v. United States Mutual Accident Association
...2 upon the members of divisions AAA, B, C, D and E. Therefore, if she can recover all, she is only entitled to nominal damages. O'Brien v. Society, 117 N.Y. 319; Martin Ins. Co., 29 N.Y.S. R. 421; Cram v. Ins. Co., 33 N.Y.S. R. 670; Ball v. Association, 64 N.H. 291; Newman v. Association, 7......
-
American Union Life Ins. Co. v. Judge
... ... & Loan Co. v ... Snyder, 16 Wend. (N.Y.) 481; Rann v. Home Ins ... Co., 59 N.Y. 387; Dilleber v. Home Life Ins ... Co., 69 N.Y ... 459, 466; affirmed, 80 F. 766; ... Clapp v. Mass. Ben. Assn., 146 Mass. 519; Hann ... v. The National Union, 97 Mich. 513; ... ...