O'Brien v. Plumides
| Citation | 348 S.E.2d 805,318 N.C. 409 |
| Decision Date | 07 October 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 152PA86,152PA86 |
| Parties | Cathy Surls O'BRIEN v. Michael G. PLUMIDES. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Plumides, Plumides & Caudle by Michael G. Plumides, Charlotte, pro se.
Bender & Lawson by Jean B. Lawson, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.
On review upon defendant-appellant's petition for writ of certiorari allowed by this Court on 7 April 1986 to review a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals reported at 79 N.C.App. 159, 339 S.E.2d 54 (1986), reversing the judgment of Snepp, J., entered 5 March 1986 in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, granting summary judgment for the defendant-appellant.
We conclude that defendant-appellant's petition for writ of certiorari was improvidently allowed.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- State v. Lindsey
-
Guess v. Parrott
...the general law of contract. See O'Brien v. Plumides, 79 N.C.App. 159, 161, 339 S.E.2d 54, 55, cert. improvidently allowed, 318 N.C. 409, 348 S.E.2d 805 (1986). However, as explained in section I of this opinion, the general contract rules were cast aside in favor of the modern rule for rea......
- State v. Hosey
-
Tew v. Brown
...80, 82-83 (1955), declined to follow on other grounds, O'Brien v. Plumides, 79 N.C.App. 159, 339 S.E.2d 54, cert. dismissed, 318 N.C. 409, 348 S.E.2d 805 (1986). The attorney, therefore, is not required to prove "the reasonable value of his services" in an action to recover fees under the c......