O'brien v. Rideout

Decision Date28 March 1894
Citation36 N.E. 792,161 Mass. 170
PartiesO'BRIEN v. RIDEOUT.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

James F. Aylward and M.B. Coogan, for plaintiff.

H.N. Sheldon, for defendant.

OPINION

BARKER, J.

1. The plaintiff was hired as a common laborer, and the defendant was not present when he was put to work on the saw by the foreman, although he had seen the plaintiff at work upon it before the day of his injury. On the morning of that day the plaintiff had asked the foreman for permission to saw up some lumber on another saw, and before that day he had worked upon a circular saw six or seven times, three of which were upon the saw which injured him. If, under these circumstances, it was negligent for the foreman to send him to work upon the saw, the negligence was that of a fellow workman. See Moody v. Manufacturing Co. (Mass.) 34 N.E. 185, and cases cited.

2. The evidence does not justify a finding that the foreman by whom the plaintiff was sent to work upon the saw was a person whose sole or principal duty was that of superintendence. He was "at work, pretty much all the time, in getting out lumber, or piling it up or arranging it, and in operating saws." Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Grebenstein v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1910
    ... ... Ahern v. Hildreth, 183 Mass. 296, 67 N.E. 328; ... Healey v. George F. Blake Manuf. Co., 180 Mass. 270, ... 62 N.E. 270; O'Brien v. Rideout, 161 Mass. 170, ... 36 N.E. 792; Kalleck v. Deering, 161 Mass. 469, 37 ... N.E. 450, 42 Am. St. Rep. 421; Moody v. Hamilton Manuf ... Co., 159 ... ...
  • Adasken v. Gilbert
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1896
    ... ... Cashman v ... Chase, 156 Mass. 342, 31 N.E. 4; Shepard v. Railroad ... Co., 158 Mass. 174, 33 N.E. 508; O'Brien. v ... Rideout, 161 Mass. 170, 36 N.E. 792; Dowd v ... Railroad Co., 162 Mass. 185, 38 N.E. 440; ... ...
  • Moses v. Sprague, Nugent Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 24, 1914
    ... ... 309, ... 104 N.E. 840; Henahan v. Lyons, 201 Mass. 269, 87 ... N.E. 602; Stevens v. Strout, 200 Mass. 432, 86 N.E ... 907; O'Brien v. Rideout, 161 Mass. 170, 36 N.E ... 792; Mulligan v. McCaffery, 182 Mass. 420, 65 N.E ...          There ... was no testimony warranting a ... ...
  • Glass v. Hazen Confectionery Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1912
    ... ... her there. Grace v. United Society Called Shakers, ... 203 Mass. 355, 89 N.E. 552. Cases like O'Brien v ... Rideout, 161 Mass. 170, 36 N.E. 792, and Grebenstein ... v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., 205 Mass. 431, 91 ... N.E. 411, where the plaintiff was set ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT