Brillis v. Brillis
| Decision Date | 07 January 1957 |
| Citation | 158 N.Y.S.2d 780,3 A.D.2d 662 |
| Parties | Aspasia BRILLIS, Respondent, v. Petros BRILLIS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Bernard Meyerson, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Irving Markowitz, New York City, Esther S. Wittes, New York City, on the brief, for respondent.
In an action to annul a marriage on the ground of fraud, the appeal is from a judgment (designated in the notice of appeal as an order) entered after trial in favor of respondent. Judgment, 207 Misc. 104, 137 N.Y.S.2d 32, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Kober v. Kober
...she had stated to him that she would not marry a German-born alien. In Brillis v. Brillis (207 Misc. 104, 137 N.Y.S.2d 32, affd. 3 A.D.2d 662, 158 N.Y.S.2d 780), a marriage was annulled where the evidence established that the defendant did not intend, at the time when he induced plaintiff's......
-
Brillis v. Brillis
...v. Petros BRILLIS, Appellant. Court of Appeals of New York. May 16, 1957. Appeal from Supreme Court, Division, Second Department, 3 A.D.2d 662, 158 N.Y.S.2d 780. Wife brought action for annulment of marriage, on ground of fraud. It was the contention of the wife that husband, who was a resi......