Brinkley Car Works & Mfg. Co. v. Lewis
Decision Date | 23 June 1900 |
Citation | 57 S.W. 1108 |
Parties | BRINKLEY CAR WORKS & MFG. CO. v. LEWIS. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Monroe county; James L. Thomas, Judge.
Action by G. R. Lewis against the Brinkley Car Works & Manufacturing Company to recover for a personal injury. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while in employ of appellant. It is alleged in the complaint that, for about five years prior to the time of injury (November 27, 1897), plaintiff (appellee) had been working around the mill and lumber yard of defendant (appellant), which is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of lumber on an extensive scale; that it was plaintiff's duty to push loaded cars from the mill, on tracks, to various parts of the yard; that defendant had carelessly piled green lumber too near the track on which plaintiff's car was operated, which green lumber on said 27th day of November, 1897, fell on plaintiff and greatly injured him; that defendant had failed to furnish plaintiff a safe place in which to labor, or safe appliances to work with; that plaintiff was damaged by the injury in the sum of $10,000, for which sum he brought suit. Defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint, and alleged that, if plaintiff was injured at the time mentioned, the injury resulted from the negligence of plaintiff and his fellow workmen. On May 3, 1898, the case was tried, and plaintiff recovered judgment for $125. Motion for new trial was filed May 4th. Motion was overruled, and defendant excepted. In due time defendant filed its bill of exceptions, and appealed to this court. The evidence, in full, on the part of the plaintiff, is as follows: Isom Humphrey testified as follows: Tom Hicks: G. R. Lewis, the plaintiff: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brinkley Car Works & Manufacturing Company v. Lewis
... ... because the place was not safe." Little Rock, M. R. & T. Ry. v. Leverett, 48 Ark. 333, 3 S.W. 50; ... Davis v. Ry. 53 Ark. 117, 13 S.W. 801; ... Fones v. Phillips, 39 Ark. 17; ... Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co. 102 Mass ... 572; Sullivan v. India Mfg. Co., 113 Mass ... 396. This doctrine seems to accord with sound reason and ... principle, as well as with the weight of the adjudications on ... this question, and we see no reason to justify a departure ... It is ... shown by the evidence of the plaintiff (the appellee) ... ...