Britain v. Maass

Decision Date24 April 1992
Citation825 P.2d 657,111 Or.App. 438
PartiesHomer BRITAIN, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent. 90 C 11681; CA A67827.
CourtOregon Court of Appeals

Jay Edwards, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Bartz v. State, CV-0091-TM
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1992
    ...nor violates petitioners' federal due process rights. of petitioner Britain's petition for post-conviction relief. Britain v. Maass, 111 Or.App. 438, 825 P.2d 657 (1992). THE MEANING OF ORS A. The Exception. Petitioner Bartz pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree, ORS 163.355, and was p......
  • Britain v. Maass
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • April 24, 1992

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT